Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/27/2003
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 260711
|
|
|
01/29/2003
|
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
INSOLVENT BELOW
|
|
01/30/2003
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 260711
|
(O&5) W/APPENDIX & DISKETTE
|
|
02/10/2003
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: WE Michael J. Neimand 239437
|
(O&5) W/APPENDIX & DISKETTE
|
|
05/12/2003
|
ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
SENT TO WEST 5/23/2003
|
|
06/06/2003
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 260711
|
(O&7) W/DISKETTE (NO APPENDIX) (CERT. OF SERVICE DATE INCORRECT) (REQUESTED A AMENDED CERT. OF SERVICE AND A APPENDIX)
|
|
06/12/2003
|
APPENDIX
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 260711
|
(O&7)
|
|
06/12/2003
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 0260711 (O&7) (AMENDED)
|
|
06/23/2003
|
NOTICE-COUNS SUBSTITUTION
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Celia Terenzio 656879
|
CELIA A. TERENZIO AND RICHARD VALUNTAS ARE SUBSTITUTED AS COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT IN PLACE OF MICHAEL J. NEIMAND
|
|
06/30/2003
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks
|
5 VOLUMES W/1 VOLUME CC PAPERS
|
|
06/30/2003
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard Valuntas 151084
|
O&7 W/DISKETTE (NO SOA)
|
|
07/01/2003
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Respondent's answer brief on the merits, which was filed with this Court on June 30, 2003, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210(b)(4) and is hereby stricken. Respondent is hereby directed, on or before July 11, 2003, to serve an amended answer brief on the merits with a Summary of Argument.
|
|
07/10/2003
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard Valuntas 151084
|
O&7 W/DISKETTE
|
|
07/10/2003
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Nathaniel Williams BY: PT Robert Kalter 260711
|
O&7 W/DISKETTE
|
|
12/11/2003
|
DISP-REMANDED
|
|
We quash in part the Third District's decision in this case and remand for reconsideration under the correct harmless error standard. We decline to address the additional issue raised by Williams that is beyond the scope of the conflict issue. See Asbell v. State, 715 So. 2d 258, 258 (Fla. 1998).
|
|
01/06/2004
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
|
5 VOL.
|
|
01/06/2004
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
01/12/2004
|
RECORD CENTER
|
|
C00000081859
|
|
07/06/2009
|
FILE DESTROYED
|
|
|