Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
07/26/2007 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT Eric Aaron Jacobs 189065
07/26/2007 ORDER-FILING FEE DUE The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction in the lower tribunal; however, said notice was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or an order of insolvency from the district court of appeal as required by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.120(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the notice. Petitioner is allowed to and including August 27, 2007, in which to submit the filing fee or an order of insolvency. Failure to submit either of the above referenced documents to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the notice. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement.
08/02/2007 JURIS INITIAL BRIEF PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 O&5 & E-MAIL
08/02/2007 Filing Fee $300 2007 - 1006912 Amount: $300
08/02/2007 Fee Paid in Full
08/02/2007 LETTER PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 DATED 08/01/2007, WITH ENCLOSED CHECK #2235 IN THE AMOUNT OF $300.00
08/02/2007 APPENDIX PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 O&5
08/27/2007 JURIS ANSWER BRIEF RS V-Strategic Group, Llc BY: RS Craig S. Barnett 35548 O&5 & E-MAIL
08/27/2007 APPENDIX RS V-Strategic Group, Llc BY: RS Craig S. Barnett 35548 O&5
09/14/2007 ORDER-OA&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
09/14/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
10/10/2007 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 O&7 & E-MAIL
10/10/2007 APPENDIX PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 INITIAL BRIEF MERITS (O&7)
10/11/2007 ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE) Petitioner's initial brief on the merits, which was filed with this Court on October 10, 2007, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and is hereby stricken. Petitioner is hereby directed, on or before October 31, 2007, to serve an original and seven copies of an amended initial brief which contains a conclusion that does not exceed one page.
10/16/2007 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk BY: Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk 1 VOLUME OF RECORD
10/24/2007 INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT David H. Charlip 329932 O&7 & E-MAIL
11/15/2007 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS V-Strategic Group, Llc BY: RS Craig S. Barnett 35548
11/15/2007 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including November 30, 2007, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
11/30/2007 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS V-Strategic Group, Llc BY: RS Craig S. Barnett 35548 O&7 (& E-MAIL)
11/30/2007 APPENDIX RS V-Strategic Group, Llc BY: RS Craig S. Barnett 35548 O&7
12/17/2007 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Pro-Art Dental Lab, Inc. BY: PT Eric Aaron Jacobs 189065 O&7 NO E-MAIL (12/18/2007: E-MAIL REC'D)
03/05/2008 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
07/10/2008 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED In this case, the county court erroneously exercised subject-matter jurisdiction where it had none. County courts may not determine ejectment claims, and the summary procedure of chapter 51 does not apply to ejectment actions. Further, when a plaintiff specifically pleads ejectment, a county court may not sua sponte amend the plaintiff's complaint to vest itself with jurisdiction and to rationalize the application of chapter 51 summary proceedings. This case should never have progressed this far. Nonetheless, since it has, we must quash and remand to the Fourth District Court of Appeal. The Fourth District is directed to effectuate our decision by remanding to the Broward County Court with directions consistent with this opinion.
08/01/2008 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
08/01/2008 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk BY: Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk 1 VOLUME
08/29/2008 ARCHIVES file