|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
09/01/2005
|
REQUEST-ADVISORY OPINION (ATTY GEN)
|
PT Advisory Opinion To The Attorney General BY: PT Hon. Charles J. Crist, Jr.
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
09/01/2005
|
No Fee Required
|
|
|
|
|
09/02/2005
|
ORDER-HIGH PROFILE
|
|
Because of significant public and media interest in this matter, counsel for the parties are directed to hereafter file an original and eight (8) copies of all pleadings filed with this Court. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents AOSC04-84 dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to include a copy of all documents, including any attachments and appendices, in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
|
|
09/02/2005
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (AG ADVISORY OPIN)
|
|
Interested parties shall file their briefs on or before September 22, 2005, and serve a copy thereof on the Attorney General. Answer briefs shall be filed on or before October 12, 2005. Please file an original and eight (8) copies of all briefs. In addition to paper briefs, per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents AOSC04-84 dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to include a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order. Briefs submitted will be placed on the Court's Internet site (http://www.floridasupremecourt.org).
|
|
09/12/2005
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
W/APPENDIX (O&8) & E-MAIL
|
|
09/12/2005
|
MOTION-EXPEDITE
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL) FILED AS "SUGGESTION FOR AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MOTION TO EXPEDITE"
|
|
09/20/2005
|
ORDER-EXPEDITE DY
|
|
Floridians Against Inequities in Rates' suggestion for amended briefing schedule and motion to expedite are hereby denied.
|
|
09/22/2005
|
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Howard E. Adams 322210
|
|
|
09/22/2005
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Howard E. Adams 322210
|
W/APPENDIX (O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
10/12/2005
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
O&8
|
|
10/12/2005
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Sponsor's answer brief, which was filed with this Court on October 12, 2005, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and is hereby stricken. Sponsor is hereby directed, on or before November 2, 2005, to serve an original and eight (8) copies of an amended answer brief which contains a Summary of the Argument.
|
|
10/12/2005
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Howard E. Adams 322210
|
(O&8) OF INTERESTED PARTIES TO ADD FLORIDA BANKERS ASSOCIATION AS INTERESTED PARTY
|
|
10/12/2005
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Howard E. Adams 322210
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
10/19/2005
|
MOTION-BRIEF AMENDMENT
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP David L. Powell 656305
|
(O&8) FILED AS "MOTION TO CORRECT ANSWER BRIEF OF INTERESTED PARTIES"
|
|
10/19/2005
|
ORDER-BRIEF AMENDMENT GR
|
|
The Motion to Correct Answer Brief, filed by the Florida Association of Realtors, et al., is granted, however the Florida Association of Realtors, et al. are required to file an original and eight (8) copies of an amended answer brief.
The answer brief filed with this Court on October 12, 2005, by the Florida Association of Realtors, et al., is hereby stricken.
|
|
10/20/2005
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
10/24/2005
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP David L. Powell 656305
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
12/09/2005
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above cases are hereby consolidated for purposes of oral argument and are scheduled for argument at 9:00 a.m., Monday, February 6, 2006. A maximum of twenty (20) minutes to the side as consolidated, is allowed, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
12/09/2005
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE GR
|
|
The motion to add Florida Bankers Association as interested party, filed by the Florida Association of Realtors, et al., is hereby granted.
|
|
02/02/2006
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
OP Florida Farm Bureau Federation BY: OP Dan R. Stengle 352411
|
FILED AS "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS ON CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY" (O&7)(E-FILE)
|
|
02/03/2006
|
ORDER-ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR REMOVAL
|
|
The above cases which were scheduled for oral argument on Monday, February 6, 2006, have been removed from the oral argument calendar.
Any party in this case wishing to respond to the Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefs on Changed Circumstances and Notice of Supplemental Authority filed February 2, 2006, by the Florida Association of Realtors, et al., shall have to and including Monday, February 13, 2006, in which to file said responses.
|
|
02/03/2006
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
|
|
BY: OP Dan R. Stengle 0352411 FOR MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS ON CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES AND NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (E-FILE)
|
|
02/08/2006
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
(O&8) FILED AS "RESPONSE AND MOTION TO STRIKE THE INTERESTED PARTIES' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS ON CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES"; 03/09/2006 MOTION DENIED.
|
|
02/13/2006
|
RESPONSE
|
OP Florida Farm Bureau Federation BY: OP Dan R. Stengle 352411
|
TO MOTION TO STRIKE THE INTERESTED PARTIES' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS ON CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES (O&8 AND E-FILE)
|
|
03/09/2006
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE GR
|
|
After considering the motions, the Court finds that supplemental briefing would be beneficial to the Court. Therefore, the Court grants the Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Briefs on Changed Circumstances and denies the Motion to Strike.
|
|
03/28/2006
|
SUPP INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP David L. Powell 656305
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
03/29/2006
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
The supplemental initial brief, which was filed with this Court on March 28, 2006, by the The Florida Association of Realtors, et al., does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and is hereby stricken. The Florida Association of Realtors, et al. are hereby directed, on or before April 18, 2006, to serve an original and eight (8) copies of an amended supplemental initial brief which contains a conclusion that does not exceed one (1) page.
|
|
|
03/29/2006
|
SUPP INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
|
03/30/2006
|
SUPP INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP David L. Powell 656305
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
|
04/18/2006
|
SUPP ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Dan R. Stengle 352411
|
O&8 & E-MAIL
|
|
|
04/21/2006
|
SUPP ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
|
05/01/2006
|
SUPP REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: PT David Gregory Tucker 701327
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
|
05/01/2006
|
SUPP REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
OP Florida Farm Bureau Federation BY: OP Howard E. Adams 322210
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
07/07/2006
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above cases are hereby consolidated and scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, November 1, 2006. A maximum of twenty (20) minutes to the side is allowed, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary. TO VIEW ORDER SEE SC05-1564.
|
|
07/07/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
07/09/2006
|
MAIL RETURNED
|
|
HON. JOHN MCKAY - 03/09/2006 ORDER - 08/08/2006: REMAILED TO CORRECT ADDRESS
|
|
07/27/2006
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
PT Advisory Opinion To The Attorney General BY: PT Lynn C. Hearn 123633
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
11/01/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
11/16/2006
|
MOTION-DISMISS
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Dan R. Stengle 352411
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
11/22/2006
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE)
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: PT David Gregory Tucker 701327
|
FILED AS " FLORIDIANS AGAINST INEQUITIES IN RATES' CONSENTED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH TO SERVE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS" (O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
11/27/2006
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE)
|
|
Floridians Against Inequities in Rates' Consented Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to Serve Response to Motion to Dismiss is granted and respondent is allowed to and including December 8, 2006, in which to serve its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR SERVING THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
|
|
12/08/2006
|
MOTION-STRIKE
|
SPR Floridians Against Inequities In Rates FAIR BY: SPR Robert L. Nabors 97421
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL) FILED AS: RESPONSE AND MOTION TO STRIKE INTERESTED PARTIES' MOTION TO DISMISS; DENIED 02/05/2007
|
|
12/14/2006
|
RESPONSE
|
OP Florida Association Of Realtors, Inc. BY: OP Cynthia Skelton Tunnicliff 134939
|
"TO MOTION TO STRIKE THE INTERESTED PARTIES' MOTION TO DISMISS" (O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
02/05/2007
|
ORDER-DISMISS DY
|
|
Interested Parties Florida Association of Realtors, Inc., Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Florida Retail Federation, et al.'s, motion to dismiss is hereby denied.
Floridians Against Inequities in Rates' motion to strike is hereby denied as moot.
|
|
|
03/22/2007
|
DISP-DISAPPROVED
|
|
In accordance with the discussion set out above, we find no single-subject violation in any of the three proposals submitted (case nos. SC05-1564, SC05-1565 and SC05-1566). In the first and second cases (case nos. SC05-1564 and SC05-1565), we find the only flaw in the ballot summaries to consist of the confusion created by the conflicting deadlines provided in the proposals. This flaw, however, prevents us from approving placement on the ballot for these two proposals. In the third case (case no. SC05-1566), we find no single-subject or ballot summary flaw and we approve the placement of this proposal on the ballot. We find no flaw in the financial impact statement submitted in all three cases (case nos. SC05-1833, SC05-1834, and SC05-1835), and we approve those statements.
|
|
06/12/2007
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
