Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
Click to open document 08/23/2010 NOTICE-APPEAL (BOND VALID) AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681
08/23/2010 MOTION-BRIEF PAGE ENLARGEMENT AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 FILED AS "MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS; MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME" (O&7) (REC'D 08/20/2010) - MOTION EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IS DENIED & MOTION EXTENSION IS GRANTED - SEE ORDER DATED 09/03/2010
08/25/2010 MOTION-EXPEDITE AE Sarasota County Board Of County Commissioners SARASOT BY: AE Alan William Roddy 947644 FILED AS "SARASOTA COUNTY'S OBJECTION TO APPELLANT'S EXTENSION OF TIME, AND COUNTY'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL AND TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT"
08/25/2010 MOTION-EXPEDITE AE City Of Sarasota, Florida SARASOT BY: AE Susan Hamilton Churuti 284076 FILED AS "THE CITY OF SARASOTA'S OBJECTION TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, AND CITY'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE APPEAL AND TO WAIVE ORAL ARGUMENT"
08/26/2010 Filing Fee $300 2010 - 1013912 Amount: $300
08/26/2010 Fee Paid in Full
08/30/2010 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 O&7 & E-MAIL (EXCEEDS PAGE LIMIT) - **BRIEF STRICKEN** - SEE ORDER DATED 09/03/2010)
08/30/2010 APPENDIX AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 VOLUMES I, II, III (& E-MAIL IN PDF)
08/30/2010 REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 O&1
08/30/2010 RESPONSE AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 FILED AS "CITIZENS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXPEDITE AND DISPENSE WITH ORAL ARGUMENT" (O&1)
09/03/2010 ORDER-EXPEDITE GR The Motions to Expedite are hereby granted. Upon consideration of Appellants Motion to Exceed Page Limitations and Motion for Extension of Time, it is ordered that the Motion for Extension of Time is granted and appellants brief on the merits was filed with this Court on August 30, 2010. Appellants Motion to Exceed Page Limitations is hereby denied and said brief filed with this Court on August 30, 2010, is hereby stricken. Appellant is allowed to and including September 10, 2010, to serve an amended brief on the merits which does not exceed fifty pages in length. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
09/03/2010 ORDER-NO REQ SCHED (MISC) The above case will be submitted to the Court without oral argument. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, if you have not already done so, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
09/03/2010 MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE MA First Amendment Foundation, Inc. BY: MA Victor L. Chapman 407429 THE FIRST AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.. (09/07/2010: ORIGINAL FILED.)
09/03/2010 ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE GR The motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae filed by The First Amendment Foundation, Inc. is hereby granted and they are allowed to file an amicus curiae brief only. Said amicus is allowed to and including September 10, 2010, to serve its brief. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
Click to open document 09/13/2010 INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 O&7 & E-MAIL
Click to open document 09/13/2010 AMICUS CURIAE INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS MA First Amendment Foundation, Inc. BY: MA Victor L. Chapman 407429 O&7 & E-MAIL
09/14/2010 ORDER-HIGH PROFILE Because of significant public and media interest in this matter, counsel for the parties are directed to hereafter file an original and eight copies of all pleadings filed with this Court. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all documents, including any attachments and appendices, in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order. All electronic documents filed shall be accessible to persons with disabilities in the manner required by Section 508 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, sections 282.601 through 282.606, Florida Statutes, and any related regulations or guidelines. FOR GENERAL FILING INFORMATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. AOSC04-84, PLEASE VISIT THE CLERK'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/index.shtml.
Click to open document 09/15/2010 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS AE City Of Sarasota, Florida SARASOT BY: AE Susan Hamilton Churuti 284076 (O&7 & E-MAIL)
09/15/2010 APPENDIX AE City Of Sarasota, Florida SARASOT BY: AE Susan Hamilton Churuti 284076 (SUPPLEMENTAL - 2 VOLUMES) - O&7 & E-MAIL
Click to open document 09/16/2010 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS AE Sarasota County Board Of County Commissioners SARASOT BY: AE Alan William Roddy 947644 O&8 & E-MAIL
09/16/2010 APPENDIX AE Sarasota County Board Of County Commissioners SARASOT BY: AE Alan William Roddy 947644 (SUPPLEMENTAL - 6 VOLUMES (6 BOXES CONTAINING COPIES) - (O&8 & E-MAIL)
Click to open document 10/05/2010 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS AA Sarasota Citizens For Responsible Government SARASOT BY: AA Andrea Flynn Mogensen 549681 0&8 & E-MAIL
Click to open document 10/28/2010 DISP-AFFIRMED We affirm the trial court's judgment validating bonds proposed for issuance by the City of Sarasota and the County of Sarasota in furtherance of the agreement bringing the Baltimore Orioles to Sarasota for spring training. Because Bullock's so-called negotiations team only served an informational role, it was not subject to the requirements of the Sunshine Law. The County also did not violate the Sunshine Law when Bullock, assisted by other County staff, briefed individual Board members prior to the July 22, 2009 public meeting. Finally, any possible violations that occurred when Board members circulated e-mails among each other were cured by subsequent public meetings regarding the negotiations and agreement with Orioles.
10/28/2010 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
02/17/2011 ARCHIVES 1 Boxes and File