Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
12/03/2018
|
PETITION-HABEAS CORPUS
|
PT Joseph Edward Jordan 180632 BY: PT Maria Christine Perinetti 13837
|
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
|
|
12/04/2018
|
No Fee Required
|
|
3.851 Proceeding
|
|
12/04/2018
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
12/04/2018
|
ORDER-RESPONSE/REPLY REQUESTED
|
|
Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Respondent is hereby requested to file a response to the above-referenced petition on or before February 11, 2019. Petitioner shall have forty days after filing of the response in which to file the reply to response.
|
|
02/11/2019
|
RESPONSE
|
RS Mark S. Inch, Etc. BY: RS Patrick Albert Bobek 112839
|
Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
|
|
02/12/2019
|
ORDER-CASE STYLE CHANGE
|
|
The style of the above case has been changed from Joseph Edward Jordan vs. Julie L. Jones, etc. to Joseph Edward Jordan vs. Mark S. Inch, etc.
|
|
03/20/2019
|
NOTICE-COUNS SUBSTITUTION
|
PT Joseph Edward Jordan 180632 BY: PT Adrienne Joy Shepherd 1000532
|
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel
|
|
03/20/2019
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Joseph Edward Jordan 180632 BY: PT Adrienne Joy Shepherd 1000532
|
Petitioner's Reply to Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
|
|
05/21/2019
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above cases are hereby scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Friday, August 30, 2019. A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
05/28/2019
|
NOTICE-COUNS SUBSTITUTION
|
PT Joseph Edward Jordan 180632 BY: PT Adrienne Joy Shepherd 1000532
|
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel
|
|
08/30/2019
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
12/05/2019
|
DISP-DENIED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the trial court's order denying Jordan relief from his conviction and deny his habeas petition. It is so ordered.
|
|
01/22/2020
|
ORDER-NOTICE OF DELAY
|
|
Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. of the Florida Constitution provides that all state-level appeals and collateral attacks on any judgment must be complete within two years of the date of appeal in non-capital cases and five years from the date of appeal in capital cases unless a court enters an order with specific findings as to why the court was unable to comply and the circumstances causing the delay. Pursuant to the administrative procedures and definitions set forth in Supreme Court of Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-76, this case was not completed within the time frame required by Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. because the time frame had already expired by the time this case was filed.
|
|
02/18/2020
|
MOTION-MANDATE RECALL
|
RS Mark S. Inch, Etc. BY: RS Patrick Albert Bobek 112839
|
|
|
02/18/2020
|
MOTION-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION
|
RS Mark S. Inch, Etc. BY: RS Patrick Albert Bobek 112839
|
Motion to Permit Belated Cross-Appeal and Supplemental Briefing
|
|
02/19/2020
|
NOTICE-APPEAL (CROSS)
|
RS Mark S. Inch, Etc. BY: RS Patrick Albert Bobek 112839
|
State's Notice of Cross-Appeal
*Stricken, per 2/17/2021 Order*
|
|
03/02/2020
|
RESPONSE
|
PT Joseph Edward Jordan 180632 BY: PT Adrienne Joy Shepherd 1000532
|
Appellant's Response to Appellee's Motion to Recall Mandate and Motion to Permit Belated Cross-Appeal and Supplemental Briefing
|
|
03/31/2020
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
The proceedings in the circuit court and in this Court in the above case are stayed pending disposition of State of Florida v. Michael James Jackson, Case No. SC20-257 and State of Florida v. Bessman Okafor, Case No. SC20-323, which are pending in this Court.
|
|
02/17/2021
|
ORDER-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION DY
|
|
Appellee/Respondent's Motion to Permit Belated Cross-Appeal and Supplemental Briefing is hereby denied and the State's Notice of Cross-Appeal, filed with this Court on February 19, 2020, is stricken.
Appellee/Respondent's Motion to Recall Mandate is hereby denied.
|