|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/17/2019
|
NOTICE-APPEAL (3.851 INITIAL)
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA James L. Driscoll 78840
|
|
|
01/18/2019
|
No Fee Required
|
|
3.851 Proceeding
|
|
|
01/18/2019
|
COPY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL ORDER/ACTION BEING APPEALED
|
|
Order on Motion to Vacate Judgment of Conviction and Sentence
|
|
|
01/23/2019
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Nicholas Thomas GADSDEN BY: Nicholas Thomas GADSDEN
|
Filed Electronically
|
|
|
01/24/2019
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
|
01/24/2019
|
ORDER-DEP BRIEF SCHED (100)
|
|
The record having been received by the Court, the briefs in the above styled case are to be filed as follows: Appellant's brief is to be filed on or before May 3, 2019; appellee's brief shall be filed seventy days after filing of appellant's brief; and appellant's reply brief shall be filed forty days after filing of appellee's brief.
As the time for filing the briefs has already been extended, further motions for extension of time will be granted only due to a medical emergency.
|
|
|
04/29/2019
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA David Dixon Hendry 160016
|
Notice of Appearance
|
|
|
05/02/2019
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA Rachel P. Roebuck 118886
|
Initial Brief of the Appellant
|
|
|
07/10/2019
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
AE State Of Florida state1 BY: AE Lisa Hopkins 99459
|
Answer Brief of Appellee
|
|
|
08/19/2019
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA David Dixon Hendry 160016
|
Reply Brief of the Appellant
|
|
|
08/27/2019
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above cases are hereby scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, November 6, 2019. A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
|
08/28/2019
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA Rachel P. Roebuck 118886
|
|
|
11/06/2019
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
|
02/13/2020
|
DISP-AFFIRMED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: Based on the foregoing, we affirm the postconviction court's denial of relief for a new guilt phase, and we deny the petition for writ of habeas corpus. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
02/24/2020
|
MOTION-REHEARING
|
AE State Of Florida state1 BY: AE Lisa Hopkins 99459
|
Appellee's Motion for Rehearing/Clarification or for Remand for Reconsideration in Light of State v. Poole
|
|
|
03/10/2020
|
RESPONSE
|
AA Marvin Cannon N08206 BY: AA David Dixon Hendry 160016
|
Appellant's Response to Appellee's Motion for Rehearing/Clarification
|
|
|
04/01/2020
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
The proceedings in the circuit court and in this Court in the above case are stayed pending disposition of State of Florida v. Michael James Jackson, Case No. SC20-257 and State of Florida v. Bessman Okafor, Case No. SC20-323, which are pending in this Court.
|
|
|
04/27/2020
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
AE State Of Florida state1 BY: AE William D. Chappell 120449
|
|
|
|
07/02/2020
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
AE State Of Florida state1 BY: AE Jason W. Rodriguez 125285
|
Notice of Appearance and Substitution of Counsel
|
|
|
02/18/2021
|
DISP-REHEARING DY
|
|
Appellee/Respondent's "Motion for Rehearing/Clarification or for Remand for Reconsideration in Light of State v. Poole" is hereby denied.
|
|
|
03/08/2021
|
MANDATE
|
|
|
|
|
03/08/2021
|
ORDER-NOTICE OF DELAY
|
|
Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. of the Florida Constitution provides that all state-level appeals and collateral attacks on any judgment must be complete within two years of the date of appeal in non-capital cases and five years from the date of appeal in capital cases unless a court enters an order with specific findings as to why the court was unable to comply and the circumstances causing the delay. Pursuant to the administrative procedures and definitions set forth in Supreme Court of Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-76, this case was not completed within the time frame required by Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. because the time frame had already expired by the time this case was filed.
|
|
|
03/12/2021
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
