Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
05/15/2003 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Katherine Vickers Blanco 327832
06/06/2003 No Fee - State
06/17/2003 MAIL RETURNED PE Thomas P. Mccabe 166279 BY: PE Thomas P. Mccabe 166279 - RESENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER ON 6/25/03, TO NEW ADDRESS
09/08/2003 ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (MOOT) WHY THE NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT BECAUSE RESPONDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.
09/23/2003 RESPONSE PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Katherine Vickers Blanco 327832 WHY THE NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS MOOT BECAUSE RESPONDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. (O&7)
10/13/2004 ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (MOOT) Having considered the State of Florida's response to this Court's order to show cause dated September 8, 2003, and given this Court's resolution in Franklin v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S538 (Fla. Sept. 30, 2004), and State v. Green, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S549a (Fla. Sept. 30, 2004), of the issue presented by this case, petitioner is hereby directed to show cause on or before October 28, 2004, why this discretionary review proceeding should not now be dismissed as moot in light of respondent's release from the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections. Respondent may file a reply on or before November 8, 2004, through Susan L. Kelsey, Post Office Box 810, Tallahassee, Florida 32302-0810, who is hereby appointed counsel for respondent.
10/13/2004 ORDER-CASE STYLE CHANGE
11/01/2004 RESPONSE PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Katherine Vickers Blanco 327832 TO OTSC DATED 10/13/04
11/08/2004 REPLY TO RESPONSE RS Thomas P. Mccabe BY: RS Douglas E. Walker 0713031 TO OTSC DATED 10/13/04
02/17/2005 JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
02/17/2005 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED We accept jurisdiction, consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, summarily quash the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004), and State v. Green, 887 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 2004). We decline to address the additional issues, including those relating to resentencing, raised in several of these cases.
03/10/2005 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
03/24/2005 ARCHIVES