|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
07/31/2000
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. BY: PT Diran V. Seropian 773476
|
|
|
08/04/2000
|
Case Filing Fee
|
2000 - 993060 Amount: $250
|
|
|
08/04/2000
|
Fee Paid in Full
|
|
|
|
08/07/2000
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. BY: PT Diran V. Seropian 773476
|
WITH APPENDIX, O&5
|
|
08/28/2000
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF)
|
|
|
|
08/28/2000
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (JURIS BRIEF-RESPONDENT)
|
|
|
|
09/12/2000
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Nasad Azam BY: RS S. Tracy Long 843008
|
WITH APPENDIX, O&5, WRONG FONT, NO CERT/FONT, NO SOA; 9/13/00 FILED AMENDED BRIEF, WITH APPENDIX, O&5
|
|
02/07/2001
|
ORDER-OA&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
|
|
02/07/2001
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
SENT TO WEST 2/12/2001
|
|
03/02/2001
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. BY: PT Diran V. Seropian 773476
|
(TO 4-4-01)
|
|
03/05/2001
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
|
|
03/08/2001
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
|
ONE VOLUME AND ONE SUPPLE VOL.
|
|
04/09/2001
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. BY: PT Diran V. Seropian 773476
|
WITH APPENDIX ORIG & 7 (DISKETTE)
|
|
04/20/2001
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
RS Nasad Azam BY: RS S. Tracy Long 843008
|
(5-24-01)
|
|
04/24/2001
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
|
|
04/27/2001
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Nasad Azam BY: RS S. Tracy Long 843008
|
ORIG & 7 (DISKETTE)
|
|
05/23/2001
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT M/I Schottenstein Homes, Inc. BY: PT Diran V. Seropian 773476
|
WITH APPENDIX ORIG & 7 (DISKETTE)
|
|
08/27/2001
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
03/07/2002
|
DISP-APPROVED
|
|
We specifically approve the holding of the court below that under these circumstances whether a cause of action for fraudulent misrepresentation exists regarding information contained in a public record presents a question of fact. See Azam, 761 So. 2d 1195. As such decision is in direct conflict with the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal to the extent it announced the broad statement that, "Statements concerning public record cannot form the basis for a claim of actionable fraud," 732 So. 2d at 361, the Third District's view cannot stand. We hereby disapprove this broad statement contained in the Third District's Pressman v. Wolf opinion.
|
|
03/28/2002
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
|
1 VOL. RECORD W/1 SUP. VOL. RECORD
|
|
04/25/2002
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
