Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
11/06/2000 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CONST CONSTR) PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT John Earl Hubbard
11/19/2000 No Fee Required 3.800 BELOW
11/19/2000 JURIS INITIAL BRIEF PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT John Earl Hubbard ORIG (NO APPENDIX/FONT TOO SMALL) - REQ AMD BRIEF---12/11/00 AMD. BRIEF W/APPENDIX REC'D (O&5)
11/27/2000 JURIS ANSWER BRIEF RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 O&5
11/27/2000 APPENDIX RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 O&5
06/13/2001 ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/COUNS APPT/JURIS ACCEPTED AND R. MITCHELL PRUGH APPOINTED TO REPRESENT PETITIONER. ALL FURTHER PLEADINGS FOR PETITIONER SHALL BE FILED BY THE PETITIONER'S COUNSEL ONLY.
07/11/2001 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT R. Mitchell Prugh 0935980 ORIG & 7 (DISKETTE) CERT OF COMPLIANCE IN WRONG PLACE (NO APPENDIX)
07/24/2001 INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT R. Mitchell Prugh 0935980 ORIG & 7 (DISK)
07/30/2001 APPENDIX PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT R. Mitchell Prugh 0935980 O & 7
07/30/2001 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold ONE VOLUME CONSISTING OF BRIEFS FILED IN DCA AND CC PAPERS (1 VOLUME & CERTIFICATE OF CLERK FILED 1/9/03 CONSISTING OF PLEADINGS FROM TRIAL COURT)
08/01/2001 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 WITH APPENDIX 0&7 (DISK) (CERT OF COMPLIANCE IN WRONG PLACE)
08/01/2001 NOTICE RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 OF SIMILAR ISSUE (DOWNS V. ST. SC00-2382 AND BURGESS V. ST., CS. NO. SC00-1076) O&7
08/13/2001 ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 WITH APP. 0 & 7 (DISK)
08/15/2001 MISC. DOCKET ENTRY PETITIONER'S WAIVER OF REPLY BRIEF
09/04/2001 ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE) PENDING DISPOSITION OF BURGESS v. STATE SC00-1724 WHICH IS PENDING IN THIS COURT
11/26/2002 ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-DECLINE JURIS) AS TO WHY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN BURGESS V. STATE, 27 FLA. L. WEEKLY S859 (FLA. OCT. 17, 2002), SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE AND WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS REVIEW IN THIS CASE AS HAVING BEEN IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
12/12/2002 RESPONSE PT John Earl Hubbard BY: PT R. Mitchell Prugh 0935980 AS TO WHY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN BURGESS V. STATE, 27 FLA. L. WEEKLY S859 (FLA. OCT. 17, 2002), SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE AND WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS REVIEW IN THIS CASE AS HAVING BEEN IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. (O&1)
12/20/2002 REPLY TO RESPONSE RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Ronald Napolitano 175130 AS TO WHY THIS COURT'S DECISION IN BURGESS V. STATE, 27 FLA. L. WEEKLY S859 (FLA. OCT. 17, 2002), SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE AND WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT DISMISS REVIEW IN THIS CASE AS HAVING BEEN IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. (O&7) W/DISKETTE
03/13/2003 DISP-REV DISM IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED (W/O OA) NO REHEARING ALLOWED.
03/13/2003 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED 1 VOLUME & 1 PACKET CONSISTING OF DCA INITIAL BRIEF & AMENDED INITIAL BRIEF WITH APPENDIX
05/30/2003 ARCHIVES