Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
04/10/2000
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI)
|
PT Nathaniel Heath BY: PT Dana Morse Drukker 73725
|
|
|
04/10/2000
|
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
PUBLIC DEFENDER
|
|
04/12/2000
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
|
|
|
|
05/08/2000
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Nathaniel Heath BY: PT Dana Morse Drukker 73725
|
WITH APPENDIX & DISKETTE, O&7
|
|
05/18/2000
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Charmaine M. Millsaps 989134
|
WITH DISKETTE, O&7
|
|
06/09/2000
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Nathaniel Heath BY: PT Dana Morse Drukker 73725
|
O&7; 6/13/00 FILED DISKETTE
|
|
06/12/2000
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
|
4 VOLUMES & CC PAPERS
|
|
01/23/2001
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-APPEAL-CONTROLLED BY LEAD CASE)
|
|
|
|
02/05/2001
|
RESPONSE
|
PT Nathaniel Heath BY: PT Carl S. Mcginnes 230502
|
AS TO WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE CONTROLLED BY COTTON SC94996 & GRANT SC99-164 & NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (CARL S. MCGINNES, PD-TALLAHASSEE)
|
|
02/07/2001
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Charmaine M. Millsaps 989134
|
AS TO WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE CONTROLLED BY COTTON SC94996 & GRANT SC99-164 (O&7)
|
|
10/04/2001
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
PENDING FINAL RESOLUTION OF STATE v. HUGGINS SC99-27 WHICH IS PENDING IN THIS COURT
|
|
12/20/2001
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-APPEAL-CONTROLLED BY LEAD CASE)
|
|
AS TO WHY STATE v. HUGGINS SC99-27 SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE; STATE'S RESPONSE DUE 01/09/2002 & PT'S REPLY DUE 01/22/2002
|
|
01/09/2002
|
RESPONSE
|
RS State Of Florida STATE3 BY: RS Charmaine M. Millsaps 989134
|
AS TO WHY STATE v. HUGGINS SC99-27 SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE--0&7
|
|
01/17/2002
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Nathaniel Heath BY: PT Carl S. Mcginnes 230502
|
AS TO WHY STATE v. HUGGINS SC99-27 SHOULD NOT CONTROL THE OUTCOME OF THIS CASE
|
|
03/27/2002
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
|
4 VOL.
|
|
03/27/2002
|
DISP-REV GR MERITS (QUASH & REMAND) (TAG)
|
|
Upon review of the Responses to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated December 20, 2001, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted. With regard to Petitioner's constitutional challenges to the Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act (PRRP), we affirm the First District's decision and we answer the certified question in the negative, consisistant with our decision in State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 345 (Fla. 2000).
With regard to the Petitioner's challenge to his sentence for burglary of an unoccupied dwelling under the PRRP, we vacate the First District's decision and remand for reconsideration upon application of decision in State v. Huggins, 802 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 2001).
|
|
03/27/2002
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
IN CASE DISPOSITION ORDER
|
|
06/05/2002
|
RECORD CENTER
|
|
ACC#02-2194 SRC#178696
|
|
07/16/2007
|
FILE DESTROYED
|
|
|