Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
08/26/2002 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684
09/09/2002 Case Filing Fee 2002 - 997031 Amount: $250
09/09/2002 Fee Paid in Full
09/09/2002 ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
10/02/2002 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684
10/04/2002 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
10/17/2002 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684 (O&7) W/DISKETTE (NO APPENDIX)
10/17/2002 REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684
10/23/2002 APPENDIX PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684 (O&7)
10/24/2002 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS Barbara Drumm Acker BY: RS Nancy A. Hass 881635
10/25/2002 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
11/04/2002 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS Barbara Drumm Acker BY: RS Nancy A. Hass 881635 (AMENDED) (REQUESTING A LONGER EXTENSION OF TIME)
11/13/2002 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks TWO VOLUMES OF RECORD, ONE VOLUME OF EXHIBITS & CC PAPERS
11/25/2002 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
12/23/2002 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS Barbara Drumm Acker BY: RS Nancy A. Hass 881635 (O&7) W/DISKETTE
01/13/2003 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
01/13/2003 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684
02/12/2003 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684 (O&7) W/DISKETTE (DISKETTE SAVED IMPROPERLY, REQ. NEW) (NEW DISKETTE FILED 2/27/03)
03/28/2003 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR COURT ACCEPTED JURISDICTION AND SCHEDULED CASE FOR O.A. SENT TO WEST 4/11/2003.
05/08/2003 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
06/14/2004 ORDER-RECORD SUPPLEMENTATION GR (DCA) The Third District Court of Appeal is hereby directed, on or before June 29, 2004, to supplement the record on appeal with all the briefs filed in their court in the above referenced case.
06/24/2004 SUPP RECORD/TRANSCRIPT ONE VOLUME
04/14/2005 DISP-APPROVED Accordingly, the portion of a pension which has been equitably distributed to a spouse cannot be considered in determining the other spouse's ability to pay alimony because the other spouse obviously no longer has that portion of the marital asset. Similarly, the needs of a spouse should be based on that spouse's financial situation after, not before, equitable distribution. We therefore approve the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal in this case and disapprove Rogers, Paris, Ellis, Bain, and Gentile to the extent they conflict with this decision. We find that Mr. Acker's argument that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees to Mrs. Acker is not preserved for review.
04/22/2005 MAIL RETURNED 04/17/2005 OPINION FROM NANCY A. HASS; 04/25/2005 REMAILED TO CORRECT ADDRESS
04/29/2005 MOTION-REHEARING PT Charles Frederick Acker BY: PT Jerome Kavulich 0314684 (RC) O&7
06/07/2005 DISP-REHEARING DY Petitioner's Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. - RC
07/01/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks 2 VOLUMES RECORD, 1 VOLUME OF EXHIBITS AND 1 VOLUME SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD
07/01/2005 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
08/11/2005 ARCHIVES