|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
03/20/2002
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Thomas David Winokur 906336
|
|
|
03/24/2002
|
No Fee - State
|
|
|
|
03/28/2002
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Thomas David Winokur 906336
|
W/APP.. 0&5 (DISK)
|
|
04/17/2002
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Juan Naveira BY: RS Erik Courtney
|
0&5
|
|
09/30/2002
|
ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED WITHOUT ORAL ARGUMENT AND MERIT BRIEFS REQUESTED. SENT TO WEST 10/08/2002
|
|
10/23/2002
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Thomas David Winokur 906336
|
(O&7) W/APPENDIX & DISKETTE
|
|
11/15/2002
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Juan Naveira BY: RS Erik Courtney
|
(O&7) W/DISKETTE (NEW DISKETTE FILED 11/21/02)
|
|
11/25/2002
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
(CC: PAPERS & 1 VOLUME)
|
|
12/09/2002
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Thomas David Winokur 906336
|
(O&7) W/DISKETTE
|
|
04/22/2004
|
DISP-REMANDED
|
|
We approve in part and quash in part the First District's decision. We approve that part of the decision holding that upon remand from Naveira I, Naveira was entitled to raise the issue of whether the speedy trial period had expired. We quash the district court's decision on the merits, however. We hold that the defendant's right to speedy trial under 3.191 was not violated where Naveira invoked the speedy trial rule, trial was scheduled as provided in the rule's recapture provisions, and the only reason the trial was not held according to rule 3.191's recapture provision was Naveira's own motion for continuance. Thus, the trial court erred in discharging the defendant. We remand this case for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
|
|
05/13/2004
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
05/13/2004
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
|
1 VOLUME
|
|
07/09/2004
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
