|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
08/25/2003
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
|
|
08/26/2003
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
W/APPENDIX (O&5)(NO DISKETTE); 8/29/03: DISKETTE FILED; 11/07/2003: STRICKEN
|
|
08/26/2003
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
PETITIONER'S CONDITIONAL MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
|
|
08/28/2003
|
Case Filing Fee
|
2003 - 998688 Amount: $250
|
|
|
09/02/2003
|
MAIL RETURNED
|
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Dale Andrew Buckner 611654 - RESENT ON 9/3/03
|
|
11/07/2003
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE DY
|
|
Petitioner's Conditional Motion for Leave to File Jurisdictional Brief is hereby denied without prejudice to raise the jurisdictional issues in the brief which will be filed on behalf of petitioner; Petitioner's jurisdictional brief filed with this Court on 08/26/2003, is hereby stricken.
|
|
11/07/2003
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
|
|
|
|
11/25/2003
|
MOTION-RECORD SUPPLEMENTATION
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
|
|
11/25/2003
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
|
|
11/26/2003
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw
|
INDEX, 1 VOLUME RECORD, 2 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS, EXHIBIT #1 IN BINDER, EXHIBIT #2 XRAY
|
|
12/19/2003
|
ORDER-TOLLING GR
|
|
Petitioner's motion to toll time for filing initial brief on the merits is granted and the time for filing said brief is tolled pending resolution of Petitioner's Agreed Motion to Supplement Record and to Reset Deadline for Initial Brief.
|
|
01/09/2004
|
ORDER-RECORD SUPPLEMENTATION GR (DCA)
|
|
Petitioner's Agreed Motion to Supplement Record and to Reset Deadline for Initial Brief is granted. The Fifth District Court of Appeal is hereby directed to immediately supplement the record with the record before the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Case No. 5D01-3337. Petitioner is allowed to and including January 26, 2003, to serve an initial brief on the merits.
|
|
01/22/2004
|
ORDER-OTHER COURT
|
|
|
|
01/28/2004
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
O&8 W/DISKETTE (NO APPENDIX)
|
|
01/28/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RECORD ON APPEAL-SUPP)
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
|
|
01/30/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RECORD ON APPEAL-SUPP)
|
|
The motion for extension of time filed in the above cause is granted and the time for filing the supplemental record with this Court is extended to and including February 25, 2004.
|
|
02/02/2004
|
APPENDIX
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Roy D. Wasson 332070
|
O&7
|
|
02/13/2004
|
SUPP RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw
|
9 VOLUMES OF RECORD (ONE BOX)
|
|
02/17/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Richard A. Sherman 184170
|
|
|
02/17/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including March 16, 2004, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
03/18/2004
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Richard A. Sherman 184170
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 W/DISKETTE); 03/25/04: NEW DISKETTE FILED
|
|
03/25/2004
|
LETTER
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Richard A. Sherman 184170
|
TRANSMITTAL OF DISKETTE
|
|
04/13/2004
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Annabel Castle Majewski 181684
|
O&7 W/DISKETTE
|
|
04/13/2004
|
MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Annabel Castle Majewski 181684
|
O&7
|
|
04/13/2004
|
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT
|
PT Oscar Lamb BY: PT Annabel Castle Majewski 181684
|
|
|
04/26/2004
|
RESPONSE
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Richard A. Sherman 184170
|
TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (ORIGINAL ONLY); 04/29/04: 7 COPIES FILED
|
|
04/29/2004
|
LETTER
|
RS William Matetzschk BY: RS Richard A. Sherman 184170
|
TRANSMITTAL OF COPIES TO RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
|
|
05/21/2004
|
ORDER-NO REQ SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
SENT TO WEST 5/28/2004
|
|
06/23/2005
|
DISP-APPROVED
|
|
Rule 1.442(c)(3) expressly requires that a joint proposal of settlement made to two or more parties be differentiated. The rule makes no distinction between multiple plaintiffs and multiple defendants, nor does it make any distinction based on the theory of liability. Therefore, we approve the decision of the Fifth District in Matetzschk and disapprove of the decision of the Second District in Barnes to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion.
|
|
07/14/2005
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
07/14/2005
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw
|
INDEX, 1 VOLUME RECORD, 2 SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS, EXHIBIT #1 IN BINDER, EXHIBIT #2 XRAY, 9 VOLUMES OF RECORD (1BOX)
|
|
09/13/2005
|
ORDER-ATTY FEES DY (J/M/O)
|
|
|
|
01/18/2006
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
