Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
03/17/2003 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Marc Jean Paul BY: PT Andrew Stanton 46779
03/19/2003 No Fee Required SUMMARY APPEAL BELOW
04/30/2003 ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE) PENDING DISPOSITION OF BANKS v. STATE SC01-2733 WHICH IS PENDING IN THIS COURT
12/20/2004 ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
01/06/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Marc Jean Paul BY: PT Andrew Stanton 46779
01/10/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
02/03/2005 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Marc Jean Paul BY: PT Andrew Stanton 46779 O&7 W/APPENDIX AND DISKETTE
02/16/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks CERTIFICATE OF CLERK, CC PAPERS AND 1 VOLUME RECORD
02/25/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard L. Polin 230987 O&1
02/25/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
03/21/2005 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard L. Polin 230987 O&7
04/05/2005 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Marc Jean Paul BY: PT Andrew Stanton 46779 O&7 W/APPENDIX & E-FILE
04/13/2005 MOTION-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard L. Polin 230987 (O&2) FILED AS: MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER BRIEF
04/13/2005 SUPP ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Richard L. Polin 230987 O&7 & E-FILE: (STRICKEN, SEE 05/10/05 ORDER)
05/10/2005 ORDER-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION DY Respondent's motion to file supplemental answer brief is hereby denied. Respondent's supplemental answer brief on the merits which was filed with this Court on April 13, 2005, is hereby stricken.
09/01/2005 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED We have for review the decision in Paul v. State, 838 So. 2d 687 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), which certified conflict with the decisions in Murphy v. State, 773 So. 2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and Mortimer v. State, 770 So. 2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We accept jurisdiction, see art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based upon our independent review, as well as the State's concession of error, we summarily quash the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Banks v. State, 887 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 2004), to determine whether the defendant's sentence could have been imposed under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.
09/22/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks 1 VOLUME OF RECORD
09/22/2005 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
01/18/2006 ARCHIVES