Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
05/15/2003 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Katherine Vickers Blanco 327832
06/06/2003 No Fee - State
06/23/2003 NOTICE-ADDRESS CHANGE PE Ernest Lee Hardy BY: PE Ernest Lee Hardy (GLADES CORRECTIONAL INST.)
01/16/2004 ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE) The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of Franklin v. State, Case No. SC03-413, and State v. Green, Case No. SC03-532, which are now pending in this Court.
10/11/2004 ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH) Respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before October 26, 2004, why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the order being reviewed and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly S538 (Fla. Sept. 30, 2004), and State v. Green, Case No. SC03-532 (Fla. Sept. 30, 2004). Petitioner may file a reply on or before November 5, 2004.
10/25/2004 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE) PE Ernest Lee Hardy BY: PE Ernest Lee Hardy
11/02/2004 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE) Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including November 15, 2004, in which to file its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
11/09/2004 REPLY TO RESPONSE PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Tonja Rene Vickers 836974 FILED AS "PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, ETC." AND TREATED AS PREMATURE REPLY TO RESPONDENT'S RESPONSE TO OTSC DATED 10/11/2004
11/12/2004 RESPONSE PE Ernest Lee Hardy BY: PE Ernest Lee Hardy FILED AS "RESPONDENT MOTION IN RESPOND TO THE COURT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE" AND TREATED AS A RESPONSE TO THE OTSC DATED 10/11/2004 (O&5)
02/17/2005 JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
02/17/2005 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED We accept jurisdiction, consolidate these cases for purposes of this opinion, summarily quash the decisions of the Second District Court of Appeal, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions in Franklin v. State, 887 So. 2d 1063 (Fla. 2004), and State v. Green, 887 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. 2004). We decline to address the additional issues, including those relating to resentencing, raised in several of these cases.
03/10/2005 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
03/24/2005 ARCHIVES