|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
08/04/2004
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI)
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT David H. Burns 350028
|
|
|
08/17/2004
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2004 - 1000470 Amount: $300
|
|
|
08/17/2004
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
08/17/2004
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
|
|
|
|
09/02/2004
|
LETTER
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT David H. Burns 350028
|
DATED 9/1/04, RE: TRANSMITTAL OF ENVELOPES
|
|
09/02/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Talley Kaleko 487155
|
|
|
09/03/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
|
|
09/13/2004
|
MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE
|
MR Florida Defense Lawyers Association BY: MR Tracy Raffles Gunn 984371
|
REQ. AMD. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE FILED 09/22/2004)
|
|
10/12/2004
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Thomas M. Ervin, Jr. 107788
|
(O&7) (DISKETTE FILED 10/13/04): (NEW DISK FILED 10/21/04)
|
|
10/12/2004
|
APPENDIX
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Thomas M. Ervin, Jr. 107788
|
(O&7)
|
|
10/15/2004
|
ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE GR
|
|
|
|
10/20/2004
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
3 VOLUMES RECORD, CC PAPERS
|
|
10/25/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
RS Martin Electronics, Inc. BY: RS Fred Johnson 0156515
|
|
|
10/26/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
|
|
11/12/2004
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Martin Electronics, Inc. BY: RS Fred Johnson 0156515
|
O&7 W/APPENDIX AND DISKETTE (APPENDIX DOES NOT CONTAIN DCA DECISION)
|
|
11/15/2004
|
ORDER-BRIEF/APPENDIX STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Respondent's answer brief on the merits with appendix, which was filed with this Court on November 12, 2004, does not comply with Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d) and 9.210 and is hereby stricken. Respondent is hereby directed, on or before December 6, 2004, to serve an original and seven (7) copies of an amended brief with appendix which contains a conformed copy of the decision of the district court of appeal.
|
|
11/19/2004
|
AMICUS CURIAE ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
MR Florida Defense Lawyers Association BY: MR Andrew Lee Patten 98604
|
O&7 W/E-MAIL
|
|
11/23/2004
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Martin Electronics, Inc. BY: RS Fred Johnson 0156515
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 W/E-MAIL)
|
|
12/09/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT David H. Burns 350028
|
O&7
|
|
12/09/2004
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT David H. Burns 350028
|
O&7
|
|
12/10/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioners' motion for extension of time is granted and petitioners are allowed to and including December 27, 2004, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONERS FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS.
|
|
12/15/2004
|
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT David H. Burns 350028
|
|
|
12/16/2004
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Thomas M. Ervin, Jr. 107788
|
(O&7) NO DISKETTE (REQUESTING A DISKETTE) (12/16/04, DISKETTE FILED)
|
|
01/18/2005
|
ORDER-NO REQ SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction and the above case has been submitted to the Court without oral argument.
|
|
04/28/2005
|
ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED)
|
|
The Court previously accepted jurisdiction and dispensed with oral argument on January 18, 2005. The Court has now determined that oral argument should be granted and the above case is scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 7, 2005.
|
|
04/28/2005
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
06/03/2005
|
LETTER
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Ben Crump 72583
|
DATED 06/03/2005, RE: OA ATTENDANCE
|
|
06/06/2005
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Ben Crump 72583
|
TO ALLOW DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS (O&7)
|
|
06/06/2005
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE GR
|
|
Petitioners' Motion to Allow Demonstrative Exhibits is hereby granted.
|
|
06/07/2005
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
06/15/2006
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
We answer the rephrased certified question in the negative and hold that an employee who receives compensation benefits for a workplace injury under these circumstances is not barred from filing an action against an employer for the injury. The employee has not consciously elected an inconsistent workers' compensation remedy under these circumstances, and if the claimant can demonstrate that the employer's conduct causing the workplace injury is to the level otherwise required by law for such action, there is no compensation bar. Accordingly, we quash the decision below, and remand with instructions to return the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
|
|
06/16/2006
|
LETTER
|
PT Curtis Jones BY: PT Robert Scott Cox 286362
|
DATED 06/16/06, ADVISING THAT BENJAMIN CRUMP IS NOT LISTED ON THE OPINION AS COUNSEL TO MR. JONES; AND REQUEST THAT HE BE ADDED TO THE OPINION BEFORE IT IS PRINTED IN FINAL FORM
|
|
06/22/2006
|
WEST CORRESPONDENCE
|
|
Corrected Opinion - corrected to include additional counsel previously omitted.
|
|
06/23/2006
|
MAIL RETURNED
|
|
ANDREW LEE PATTEN - 06/15/2006 OPINION - 6/26/2006: RE-MAILED TO CORRECT ADDRESS
|
|
07/06/2006
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
07/06/2006
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
3 VOLUMES
|
|
09/01/2006
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
