|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
12/23/2004
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Danilo Garrido BY: PT Carlos Lidsky 193238
|
|
|
01/12/2005
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2005 - 1001274 Amount: $300
|
|
|
01/12/2005
|
Fee Paid in Full
|
|
|
|
01/12/2005
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of Malu v. Security National Insurance Co., Case No. SC03-1327, and Padilla v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., Case No. SC03-1432, which are now pending in this Court.
|
|
04/25/2005
|
MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES
|
PT Danilo Garrido BY: PT Carlos Lidsky 193238
|
O&1 (REQ COPIES): O&7 COPIES FILED 05/17/2005
|
|
04/25/2005
|
MOTION-STAY (VACATE)
|
PT Danilo Garrido BY: PT Carlos Lidsky 193238
|
FILED AS " REQUEST TO LIFT STAY BASED ON DISPOSITION OF RELATED PREDICATE CASES (O&1) (05/09/2005: DENIED AS MOOT)
|
|
05/09/2005
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH)
|
|
Respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before May 24, 2005, why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Malu v. Security National Insurance Co., 30 Fla. L. Weekly S145 (Fla. Mar. 10, 2005). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before June 3, 2005. Petitioner's Request to Lift Stay Based on Disposition of Related Predicate Cases is denied as moot.
|
|
08/05/2005
|
MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
PT Danilo Garrido BY: PT Carlos Lidsky 193238
|
FOR SUMMARY ACCEPTANCE OF JURISDICTION AND TO QUASH DECISION BEING REVIEWED (O&5)
|
|
09/01/2005
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
SEE OPINION 09/01/2005
|
|
09/01/2005
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE DY
|
|
Petitioner's Motion for Summary Acceptance of Jurisdiction and to Quash Decision Being Reviewed is hereby denied as moot.
|
|
09/01/2005
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
This Court recently approved Hunter and quashed both Malu and Padilla. See Malu v. Sec. Nat'l Ins. Co., 898 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 2005). Accordingly, and upon review of the parties' various responses or lack thereof to this Court's orders to show cause that were issued on May 5, 2005, in Gaetan, Schwartz, and Garrido, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in those three cases. It is thus ordered that the petitions for review in Gaetan, Schwartz, and Garrido are granted; that those three decisions are quashed; and that those matters are remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court's decision in Malu. No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court.
|
|
09/22/2005
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
09/29/2005
|
ORDER-ATTY FEES GR ($2500 PARTY PREVAIL - J)
|
|
Petitioner's Motion for Appellate Attorney's Fees is granted in the amount of $2,500.00, conditioned on the party prevailing pursuant to applicable statutes, rules and case law.
|
|
01/18/2006
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
