Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/20/2004
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
FILED AS AN APPEAL OF THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER DENYING APPELLANT ACCESS TO RELEVANT LEGAL MATERIALS AND TREATED AS A NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION
|
|
03/09/2004
|
No Fee Required
|
|
9.141 SUMMARY APPEAL BELOW
|
|
03/18/2004
|
LOWER TRIBUNAL DOCUMENTS
|
|
Hon. Frank J. Habershaw, Clerk D5 BY: D5 Hon. Frank J. Habershaw, Clerk D5
|
|
03/23/2004
|
MOTION-COUNS APPOINTMENT
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5)
|
|
03/23/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF)
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5) (GRANTED TO & INCLUDING 04/13/04-SEE ORDER DATED 03/24/04)
|
|
03/24/2004
|
ORDER-COUNS APPOINTMENT DY
|
|
Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied. If the Court accepts jurisdiction the motion will be reconsidered at that time. Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including April 13, 2004, in which to serve a brief on jurisdiction.
|
|
04/12/2004
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5) FILED AS NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT W/APPENDIX (DOES NOT CONTAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS, TABLE OF CITATIONS, STATMENT OF CASE AND OF THE FACTS, SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT, ARGUMENT OR A CERT. OF COMPLIANCE. THE APPENDIX CONTAINS MORE THAN THE DCA DECISION) (04/15/2004, CERTIFIED COPY FROM 5DCA FILED)
|
|
04/19/2004
|
ORDER-BRIEF/APPENDIX STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Petitioner's brief with appendix, which was filed with this Court on April 12, 2004, does not comply with Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d) and 9.210(a)(2)(b)(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) and is hereby stricken. Petitioner is hereby directed, on or before May 10, 2004, to serve an original and five (5) copies of an amended brief with appendix which contains the following in order: a Table of Contents, a Table of Citations, a Statement of the Case and of the Facts, a Summary of Argument, an Argument, a Conclusion and a Certificate of Compliance that immediately follows the Certificate of Service. The Appendix should be separately bound or separated from the brief by a divider and appropriate tab and should contain only a conformed copy of the decision of the district court of appeal.
|
|
05/10/2004
|
JURIS INITIAL AMD BRIEF
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5) FILED AS NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION OF THE SUPREME COURT
|
|
05/10/2004
|
APPENDIX (AMENDED)
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5) (CONTAINS MORE THAN DCA DECISION)
|
|
05/12/2004
|
ORDER-APPENDIX STRIKE PORTIONS (JURIS)
|
|
The appendix to petitioner's amended brief on jurisdiction, which was filed with this Court on May 10, 2004, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d). All documents contained in petitioner's appendix, with the exclusion of the district court's decision, are hereby stricken.
|
|
06/21/2004
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Angela D. Mccravy 0983391
|
|
|
06/21/2004
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Angela D. Mccravy 0983391
|
|
|
06/23/2004
|
RESPONSE
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
TO RESPONDENT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND MOTION TO TOLL
|
|
06/25/2004
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (JURIS BRIEF-RESPONDENT)
|
|
|
|
07/09/2004
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Angela D. Mccravy 0983391
|
(O&5) W/DISKETTE & APPENDIX (DISKETTE IS BLANK) (REQUESTED NEW DISKETTE) (DISKETTE FILED 7/16/04)
|
|
07/21/2004
|
JURIS REPLY BRIEF (NOT ALLOWED)
|
PS Richard Walker BY: PS Richard Walker
|
(O&5)
|
|
07/28/2004
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN AS UNAUTHORIZED
|
|
Petitioner's reply brief on jurisdiction is hereby stricken as unauthorized as there are no provisions in the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure for the filing of a reply brief on jurisdiction.
|
|
03/17/2005
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
|
|
03/17/2005
|
DISP-DISMISSED-LACK OF JURISDT
|
|
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the district court orders in the present cases fail to meet the Florida Star II standard set forth above, and we lack subject-matter jurisdiction over these cases. Accordingly, we dismiss the petitions for review. No motion for rehearing or clarification will be entertained in these cases or in any other case that we may dismiss in the future based on the reasoning set forth herein. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.330(d).
|
|
06/15/2005
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|