Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
01/15/2004 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379
01/21/2004 No Fee - Insolvent INSOLVENT BELOW
01/21/2004 ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
01/29/2004 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379
01/29/2004 MOTION-TOLL TIME PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379
01/30/2004 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including March 16, 2004, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
02/04/2004 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw 1 VOLUME INDEX AND 1 VOLUME RECORD
03/23/2004 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379 W/APPENDIX (O&7 W/DISKETTE)
03/25/2004 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD) TO INITIAL BRIEF WITH CORRECT DATE OF SERVICE
04/13/2004 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Pamela J. Koller 775990 O&7 W/DISKETTE
05/05/2004 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379
05/06/2004 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including June 2, 2004, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS.
06/04/2004 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Dwaine Woodson BY: PT A. S. Rogers 964379 O&7 W/DISKETTE
07/12/2004 ORDER-OA SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
07/12/2004 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
10/29/2004 NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Pamela J. Koller 775990 O&7
11/04/2004 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
12/16/2004 DISP-DISMISSED MISC. Upon closer inspection of these two cases, we have determined that no genuine conflict exists between them because they are factually and legally distinguishable. Accordingly, this case is hereby dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be allowed.
01/06/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw 1 VOL
01/06/2005 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
03/17/2005 ARCHIVES