|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
08/10/2005
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
|
|
08/16/2005
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2005 - 1002442 Amount: $300
|
|
|
08/16/2005
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
08/16/2005
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED (CERTIFIED)
|
|
|
|
09/14/2005
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
09/14/2005
|
APPENDIX
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
O&7
|
|
10/10/2005
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Timothy L. Hughes 618004
|
O&7 & E-MAIL (REQ AMD CERT/SERVICE) (STRICKEN-SEE ORDER DATED 10/27/05)
|
|
10/14/2005
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Frank J Habershaw BY: Frank J Habershaw
|
1 VOLUME CC PAPERS
|
|
10/14/2005
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD)
|
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Kevin P. Kelly 844160 - FOR ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
|
10/19/2005
|
MOTION-BRIEF AMENDMENT
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Kevin P. Kelly 844160
|
FILED AS MOTION TO CORRECT SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF (O&7)
|
|
10/19/2005
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Kevin P. Kelly 844160
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 W/EMAIL)
|
|
10/27/2005
|
ORDER-BRIEF AMENDMENT GR
|
|
Respondent CED Construction Partners, Ltd.'s Motion to Correct Scrivener's Error in Respondent's Answer Brief is granted and said amended brief was filed with this Court on October 19, 2005. Respondent CED Construction Partners, Ltd.'s answer brief filed with this Court on October 10, 2005, is hereby stricken.
|
|
10/28/2005
|
LETTER
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
DATED 10/26/2005 RE: CLARIFICATION OF REPLY BRF DATE
|
|
11/15/2005
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
(O&7& E-MAIL)
|
|
12/01/2005
|
ORDER-NO REQ SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
|
|
03/17/2006
|
ORDER-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION
|
|
The parties are hereby directed to file supplemental briefs, which do not exceed ten (10) pages in length, addressing whether the Federal Arbitration Act or the Florida Arbitration Code applies to this case. Petitioner's supplemental brief shall be filed on or before March 27, 2006; respondents' supplemental answer brief shall be filed on or before April 3, 2006; and petitioner's supplemental reply brief shall be filed on or before April 5, 2006.
|
|
03/27/2006
|
SUPP INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT O'Keefe Architects, Inc., BY: PT Lee L. Haas 378119
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
04/04/2006
|
SUPP ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Kevin P. Kelly 844160
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL) (NO TABLE OF CONTENTS OR CITATIONS; NO SOA OR ARGUMENT; CERT. OF SERVICE IS NOT DATED & FILED 1 DAY LATE)
|
|
04/06/2006
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Respondent CED Construction Partners, Ltd.'s supplemental answer brief, which was filed with this Court on April 4, 2006, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and is hereby stricken. Respondent is hereby directed, on or before April 17, 2006, to file an original and seven (7) copies of an amended supplemental answer brief which also includes a table of contents, a table of citations, a summary of argument, an argument, and a dated certificate of service. The above brief was not timely filed pursuant to this Court's order dated March 17, 2006, and respondent is hereby directed, on or before April 17, 2006, to file a proper motion with this Court.
|
|
04/13/2006
|
MOTION-ACCEPTANCE AS TIMELY FILED (BRIEF)
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Amanda G Simmons 728020
|
FOR SUPP. ANSWER BRIEF (FILED AS "AGREED MOTION TO ACCEPT AMENDED SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER BRIEF AS TIMELY FILED") (O&7)
|
|
04/13/2006
|
SUPP ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Ced Construction Partners, Ltd. BY: RS Kevin P. Kelly 844160
|
(O&8 & E-MAIL)
|
|
04/19/2006
|
ORDER-ACCEPTANCE AS TIMELY FILED GR (BRIEF)
|
|
Respondent CED Construction Partners, Ltd.'s motion to accept brief as timely filed is granted and respondent's amended supplemental answer brief on the merits was filed with this Court on April 13, 2006.
|
|
10/19/2006
|
DISP-APPROVED
|
|
We hold that under the FAC, a broad agreement to arbitrate, such as the one at issue in this case, includes the determination of statute of limitations defenses. Accordingly, we approve the Fifth District's decision in O'Keefe and disapprove the Fourth District's decision in Reuter Recycling.
|
|
11/09/2006
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
11/09/2006
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
Hon. Susan Wright, Clerk BY: Hon. Susan Wright, Clerk
|
1 VOLUME
|
|
01/12/2007
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
|
