Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
10/20/2005 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI) PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT Marcus Johnson
10/24/2005 No Fee Required PETITION FOR BELATED APPEAL
10/24/2005 MOTION-COUNS APPOINTMENT PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT Marcus Johnson
10/24/2005 APPENDIX PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT Marcus Johnson TO MOT-APPOINT COUNSEL
10/31/2005 ORDER-BRIEF SCHED/COUNS APPT (CERTIFIED) & Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel is granted and it is ordered that John S. Mills of Mills & Carlin, P.A., 865 May Street, Jacksonville, Florida 32204, is hereby appointed as counsel for petitioner. All further pleadings for petitioner shall be filed by the petitioner's counsel only. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(f)(4), the district court of appeal is hereby directed, within twenty (20) days from the date of this order, to provide to the above newly appointed counsel a copy of all filings before their court, including the record on appeal.
11/09/2005 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold 1 VOLUME
11/21/2005 MOTION-CONSOLIDATION PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 O&1
12/19/2005 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719
12/19/2005 MOTION-TOLL TIME PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 O&1
12/21/2005 ORDER-CONSOLIDATION GR CONSOLIDATED WITH SC05-1976
12/21/2005 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
01/09/2006 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL)
01/09/2006 REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 O&7
02/01/2006 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Tonja Rene Vickers 836974
02/02/2006 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including March 1, 2006, in which to serve the consolidated answer brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR THE FILING OF THE CONSOLDIATED ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
03/06/2006 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Tonja Rene Vickers 836974 (O&7 & E-MAIL)
03/31/2006 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 (O&7 & E-MAIL)
05/01/2006 ORDER-NO REQ SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED The Court accepts jurisdiction and the above cases have been submitted to the Court without oral argument.
02/16/2007 NOTICE PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 NAME CHANGE - MILLS & CARLIN, P.A. HAS CHANGED TO MILLS & CREED, P.A.
04/26/2007 DISP-APPROVED For the reasons stated, we approve the decision of the Second District Court of Appeal and answer both certified questions in the negative. Trial judges are not required to inform defendants of the right to appeal the denial of relief under rule 3.800(a), and defendants are not entitled to belated appeals because the trial court did not inform them of their appellate rights.
05/01/2007 MOTION-REHEARING PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 (RC) (O&7 & EMAIL)
07/11/2007 DISP-REHEARING DY Petitioners' Motion for Rehearing or Clarification is hereby denied. (RC)
07/26/2007 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold 1 VOLUME
07/26/2007 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
09/14/2007 ARCHIVES
08/11/2010 NOTICE-INQUIRY PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT John S. Mills 107719 08/16/2010: advised motion for rehearing was denied on 07/11/2007
09/07/2010 MOTION-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE PT Marcus Johnson BY: PT Marcus Johnson FILED AS "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI" (09/16/10: Advised your Motion for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari was received by this Court on September 7, 2010. Please be advised that this Court does not have certiorari jurisdiction. If you are seeking review of the September 23, 2005, decision of the Second District Court of Appeal, review of that decision was filed in this Court in the case styled Johnson v. State, Case No. SC05-1933, and is final in this Court as previously advised. If you are; however, seeking review of the decision of this Court in Case No. SC05-1933, be advised that the United States Supreme Court is the appropriate Court to review a decision of this Court. You may petition for a writ of certiorari. Enclosed is a sample packet to assist you in filing your petition.)