|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
11/21/2005
|
NOTICE-APPEAL (STAT/CONST INVALID)
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
|
|
11/30/2005
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2005 - 1003066 Amount: $300
|
|
|
11/30/2005
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
12/16/2005
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
|
|
12/21/2005
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted and appellant is allowed to and including January 6, 2006, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO APPELLANT FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly; 12/29/2005: ORDER CORRECTED
|
|
01/06/2006
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
01/11/2006
|
APPENDIX
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
OF APPELLANT'S INITIAL BRIEF (O&7)
|
|
01/30/2006
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
AE Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc. BY: AE Cynthia Skelton Tunnicliff 134939
|
SHARED W/ SC05-2130
|
|
02/03/2006
|
ORDER-HIGH PROFILE
|
|
|
|
02/07/2006
|
ANSWER AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
AE Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc. BY: AE Cynthia Skelton Tunnicliff 134939
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
02/09/2006
|
ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN
|
|
In light of the filing of Respondent's amended answer brief on the merits filed with this Court on February 7, 2006, it is ordered that Respondent's answer brief on the merits filed with this Court on January 30, 2006, is hereby stricken.
|
|
03/06/2006
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
03/06/2006
|
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
(O&1)
|
|
03/10/2006
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
7 VOLUMES RECORD & 1 VOLUME CC PAPERS (SHARED WITH SC05-2130)
|
|
04/13/2006
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above cases are hereby consolidated for purposes of oral argument and are scheduled for argument at 9:00 a.m., Tuesday, June 6, 2006. A maximum of twenty (20) minutes to the side, as consolidated, is allowed for the argument.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP. TO VIEW ORDER SEE SC05-2130
|
|
04/13/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
05/16/2006
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
|
|
|
06/06/2006
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
10/16/2006
|
ORDER-BRIEF SUPPLEMENTATION
|
|
The parties in the above cases are directed to serve supplemental briefs, specifically addressing the possible operation of the non-severability clause found in section 550.71, Florida Statutes (1996) in the instance that the Court finds section 550.615(6), Florida Statutes (1996) unconstitutional: Appellants' supplemental initial briefs shall be filed on or before November 6, 2006, appellee's supplemental answer brief shall be filed on or before November 16, 2006; and appellants' supplemental reply briefs shall be filed on or before November 21, 2006. (TO VIEW ORDER SEE SC05-2130)
|
|
11/06/2006
|
SUPP INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Hartman-Tyner, Inc. BY: AA Harold F. X. Purnell 148654
|
(O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
11/16/2006
|
SUPP ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
AE Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc. BY: AE Cynthia Skelton Tunnicliff 134939
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
11/17/2006
|
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD)
|
|
FOR APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF (E-MAIL)
|
|
09/06/2007
|
DISP-AFFIRMED
|
|
Section 550.615(6) prohibits thoroughbred permitholders from engaging in intertrack wagering in "any area of the state where there are three or more horserace permitholders within 25 miles of each other." Both the trial court and the district court concluded that at the time the statute was amended in 1996, these conditions existed only in the area where Gulfstream was located, and there was no reasonable possibility that they would ever exist in another part of the state. We concur in the findings of the trial court and the conclusion of the district court. As a result, we conclude that section 550.615(6) is an unconstitutional special law enacted in the guise of a general law. Accordingly, we affirm the First District's decision below.
|
|
09/28/2007
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
7 VOLUMES RECORD & 1 VOLUME (SHARED WITH SC05-2130)
|
|
11/30/2007
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
1 file
|
