Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
05/15/2006 CERTFD JUDGMENT FROM TRIAL COURT AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339 CERTIFIED TO FSC FROM DCA-1 (1D06-2091)
05/15/2006 NOTICE-APPEAL (3.851 - ATTY FEES) AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339 (FILED IN DCA 04/26/2006)
05/15/2006 MISC. DOCKET ENTRY AGREED SUGGESTION OF CERTIFICATION FOR IMMEDIATE RESOLUTION BY THE SUPREME COURT (FILED IN DCA 05/01/2006)
05/15/2006 ORDER-DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CERTIFYING CASE TO FSC (DATED 05/12/2006)
06/15/2006 MOTION-CONSOLIDATION AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430 FILED AS "AGREED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND TO TREAT THE CASE FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES AS AN APPEAL AND CROSS APPEAL"
06/29/2006 Fee Transferred From L.T.
06/29/2006 MISC. DOCKET ENTRY AA Mark Evan Olive 0578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Bevington 503339 - DCA DOCKETING STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE (FILED IN DCA 06/12/2006)
06/29/2006 MISC. DOCKET ENTRY AE Hon. Tom Gallagher BY: AE Richard T. Donelan, Jr. 198714 - DCA DOCKETING STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE (FILED IN DCA 06/15/2006)
06/29/2006 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339 (FILED IN DCA 06/15/2006)
07/10/2006 ORDER-CONSOLIDATION GR SEE SC06-835 TO VIEW ORDER
07/10/2006 ORDER-DEP BRIEF SCHED (MISC) The motions for extension of time are granted. The consolidated briefs in the above styled cases are to be served as follows: Roger R. Maas' initial brief on the merits is to be served on or before August 7, 2006; Mark Evan Olive's answer/cross-initial brief on the merits shall be served twenty (20) days after service of the initial brief on the merits; Roger R. Maas' reply/cross-answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty (20) days after service of the answer/cross-initial brief on the merits; and Mark Evan Olive's cross reply brief on the merits shall be served ten (10) days after service of the reply/cross answer brief on the merits. (TO VIEW ORDER SEE SC06-835)
07/28/2006 MOTION-COUNS SUBSTITUTION STIPULATION AE Roger R. Maas 0128296 BY: WE Michael Pearce Dodson 179944
08/04/2006 ORDER-COUNS SUBSTITUTION STIPULATION GR (SEE SC06-835 TO VIEW ORDER)
08/04/2006 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) Appellant/Cross-Appellee's motion for extension of time is granted and appellant/cross-appellee is allowed to and including September 7, 2006, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits..(SEE SC06-835 TO VIEW ORDER)
09/28/2006 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339
09/28/2006 MOTION-TOLL TIME AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339
10/10/2006 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) Appellee/Cross-Appellant's motion for extension of time is granted and appellee/cross-appellant is allowed to and including October 17, 2006, in which to serve the initial/cross answer brief on the merits.
10/17/2006 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339 O&7 & E-MAIL (SHARED W/SC06-835); SEE 10/23/2006, ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN
10/17/2006 REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430
10/18/2006 INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Elizabeth Lewis Bevington 503339 O&7 & E-MAIL (SHARED W/SC06-835)
10/18/2006 MOTION-BRIEF AMENDMENT AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430 (SHARED WITH SC06-835)
10/23/2006 ORDER-BRIEF AMENDMENT GR SEE SC06-835 TO VIEW ORDER
11/08/2006 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) AE Roger R. Maas 0128296 BY: AE Jeremiah Hawkes 472270
11/13/2006 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS AE Tom Gallagher BY: AE Richard T. Donelan, Jr. 198714 O&7 & E-MAIL
11/22/2006 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430
12/11/2006 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) Appellant/Cross-Appellee, Roger R. Maas' motion for extension of time is granted and appellant/cross-appellee is allowed to and including December 13, 2006, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents AOSC04-84 dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
12/11/2006 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) Appellee/Cross-Appellant, Mark Evan Olive's motion for extension of time is granted and appellee/cross-appellant is allowed twenty days from service of appellant/cross-appellee, Roger R. Maas' reply brief, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents AOSC04-84 dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
12/12/2006 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS AE Roger R. Maas 0128296 BY: AE Jeremiah Hawkes 472270 O&7 & E-MAIL (SHARED W/SC06-835)
01/05/2007 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430 FILED AS "CROSS-REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT MARK EVAN OLIVE" (O&7 & E-MAIL)
03/09/2007 ORDER-OA SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED We accept jurisdiction in Olive v. Maas, etc., et al., Case No. SC06-1263, and the above consolidated cases are hereby scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, September 20, 2007. A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
03/09/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
08/30/2007 NOTICE AA Mark Evan Olive 578533 BY: AA Stephen F Hanlon 209430 FILED AS "APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT OLIVE'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION AND DISCLOSURE" (O&7)
09/20/2007 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
09/25/2008 DISP-AFFIRMED For these reasons, we conclude that in appropriate cases courts have inherent authority to grant compensation in excess of the statutory fee schedule provided in section 27.711 and attorneys may not be removed from the registry for requesting such compensation in those cases. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order granting summary judgment and declaring the parties' rights under the Registry Act.
12/22/2008 ARCHIVES