|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
07/17/2008
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Peggy Allen Luttrell BY: PT Flem Kanan Whited 271071
|
(NO CERT. OF SERVICE)
|
|
07/23/2008
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2008 - 1009188 Amount: $300
|
|
|
07/23/2008
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
07/23/2008
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Peggy Allen Luttrell BY: PT Flem Kanan Whited 271071
|
W/APPENDIX (O&5) - E-MAIL RECEIVED 07/23/2008
|
|
08/13/2008
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Florida Department Of Highway Safety And Motor Vehicles DHSMV BY: RS Heather Rose Cramer 901600
|
O&5 & E-MAIL
|
|
12/19/2008
|
ORDER-JURIS ACCEPT/BRIEF SCHED (OA LATER DATE)
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case. Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument.
Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before January 13, 2009; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits. Please file an original and seven copies of all briefs.
The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal shall file the original record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before February 19, 2009. The record shall include the briefs filed in the district court separately indexed.
|
|
01/05/2009
|
NOTICE-ADDRESS CHANGE
|
RS Florida Department Of Highway Safety And Motor Vehicles DHSMV BY: RS Heather Rose Cramer 901600
|
|
|
01/08/2009
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Hon. Susan Wright, Clerk BY: Hon. Susan Wright, Clerk
|
1 VOL. RECORD
|
|
01/09/2009
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Peggy Allen Luttrell BY: PT Flem Kanan Whited 271071
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL) (APPENDIX DOES NOT CONTAIN A COPY OF OPINION OR ORDER SEEKING REVIEW OF)
|
|
01/12/2009
|
ORDER-BRIEF/APPENDIX STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE)
|
|
Petitioner's initial brief on the merits with appendix, which was filed with this Court on January 9, 2009, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.220 and is hereby stricken. Petitioner is hereby directed, on or before February 2, 2009, to serve an original and seven copies of an amended brief with appendix. The appendix shall be separately bound or separated from the brief by a divider and appropriate tab, and shall contain an index and a copy of the opinion or order of the district court of appeal to be reviewed and may contain any other portions of the record and other authorities.
|
|
01/26/2009
|
INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Peggy Allen Luttrell BY: PT Flem Kanan Whited 271071
|
W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL)
|
|
02/16/2009
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Florida Department Of Highway Safety And Motor Vehicles DHSMV BY: RS Heather Rose Cramer 901600
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
03/12/2009
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Peggy Allen Luttrell BY: PT Flem Kanan Whited 271071
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
04/01/2009
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
04/01/2009
|
ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED)
|
|
The Court previously accepted jurisdiction. The Court will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Monday, June 1, 2009.
A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
06/01/2009
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
06/11/2009
|
DISP-REV DISM IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED (OA)
|
|
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Luttrell, 983 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 5th DCA), review granted, 1 So. 3d 172 (Fla. 2008) (table), based on express and direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Brannen v. State, 114 So. 429 (Fla. 1927). See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further, full consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is dismissed. NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
|
|
09/15/2009
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
Files
|
