Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
08/28/2008 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387
09/05/2008 Filing Fee $300 2008 - 1009456 Amount: $300
09/05/2008 Fee Paid In Full - $300
09/05/2008 JURIS INITIAL BRIEF PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387 W/APPENDIX (O&5) E-MAIL - 09/08/2008
10/01/2008 JURIS ANSWER BRIEF RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 O&5 & NO E-MAIL (BRIEF PAGINATED INCORRECTLY & EXCEEDS PAGE LIMIT)
10/01/2008 MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 O&5
10/02/2008 ORDER-BRIEF STRICKEN (NON-COMPLIANCE) Respondent's jurisdiction brief, which was filed with this Court on October 1, 2008, does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 and is hereby stricken. Respondent is hereby directed, on or before October 22, 2008, to serve an original and five copies of an amended jurisdiction brief with the table of contents and the citation of authorities only excluded from the computation and should be numbered begining with the statement of case and facts and shall not exceed ten pages in length.. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order.
10/02/2008 NOTICE-SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387
10/17/2008 JURIS ANSWER AMD BRIEF RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 O&5 & E-MAIL
01/26/2009 ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED The Court accepts jurisdiction and dispenses with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320. Petitioner's brief on the merits shall be served on or before February 20, 2009; respondent's brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's brief on the merits. Please file an original and seven copies of all briefs. The Clerk of the Second District Court of Appeal shall file the original record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before March 26, 2009. The record shall include the briefs filed in the district court separately indexed.
02/13/2009 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold VOLUMES 1 - 14 RECORD AND 1 VOLUME BRIEFS & E-MAIL (1 BOX)
02/13/2009 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387
02/16/2009 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including March 6, 2009, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits.
03/06/2009 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387 W/APPENDIX (0&7 & E-MAIL)
04/02/2009 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF) RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208
04/06/2009 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including April 13, 2009, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits.
04/09/2009 NOTICE RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 OF UNAVAILABILITY
04/16/2009 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 O&7 & E-MAIL (DID NOT SERVE COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER) REQ'D AMD CERT.OF SERVICE (04/23/2009: AMD CERT.OF SERVICE FILED)
04/23/2009 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (AMD) RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 (TO RESP'S ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) (O&7)
05/08/2009 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Kristie Hatcher-Bolin 521388 O&7 & E-MAIL
01/14/2010 DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED Based on the above analysis, we quash the Second District's decision in Arthur to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion, and approve the decisions of the First District in Martinez, Janousek, and Sylvester to the extent they are consistent with the foregoing opinion. We vacate the provision in the final judgment of dissolution permitting the Wife to relocate after twenty months and remand this case to the Second District with directions to remand to the trial court to prohibit relocation, subject to future modification in accordance with our opinion in Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So. 2d 928, 932 (Fla. 2005) ("[U]nless otherwise provided in the final judgment, the two-part substantial change test used in Cooper [v. Gress, 854 So. 2d 262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003)] applies to modification of all custody agreements."). We deny without prejudice the Wife's motion for appellate court costs, as this motion should be filed with the appropriate trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400 (a).
01/29/2010 MOTION-REHEARING RS Josette A. Arthur BY: RS Mark A. Neumaier 436208 (& E-MAIL) (RC) (02/01/10: MOTION REHEARING & AMENDED MOTION FILED)
02/05/2010 RESPONSE PT Shawn M. Arthur BY: PT Monterey Campbell, Iii 11387 FILED AS "PETITIONER'S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT'S AMENDED MOTON FOR REHEARING" (O&7)
04/12/2010 LETTER-CANON NOTIFICATION RE: JUSTICE RE: JUSTICE CANADY & THOMAS D. HALL (RESPONSES DUE 4/27/2010)
02/10/2011 DISP-REHEARING DY IN LIGHT OF REVISED OPINION In light of the revised opinion, the Respondent's Amended Motion for Rehearing is hereby denied. (RC)
03/03/2011 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
03/03/2011 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold 14 VOLUMES RECORD AND 1 VOLUME CONSTRUCTED BRIEFS
06/07/2011 ARCHIVES file