Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
03/04/2008 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT) PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070
03/07/2008 Filing Fee $300 2008 - 1008329 Amount: $300
03/07/2008 Fee Paid In Full - $300
03/10/2008 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF) PT Herbert W. Larson BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 FILED AS "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE PETITIONERS' JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF"
03/13/2008 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (JURIS BRIEF-PETITIONER)
03/17/2008 JURIS INITIAL BRIEF PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 W/APPENDIX (O&5 & E-MAIL)
04/01/2008 JURIS ANSWER BRIEF RS Tse Industries, Inc. BY: RS Marie Tomassi 772062 (O&5 & E-MAIL)
04/24/2008 ORDER-JURIS ACCEPT/BRIEF SCHED (OA LATER DATE) The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case. Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument. Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before May 19, 2008; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits. Please file an original and seven copies of all briefs. The Clerk of the Second District Court of Appeal shall file the original record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before June 24, 2008. The record shall include the briefs filed in the district court separately indexed.
05/01/2008 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold CERT. OF CLERK; 1 CONSTRUCTED VOL BRIEFS; 5 VOL & E-MAIL
05/19/2008 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 FILED AS "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS"
05/23/2008 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) Petitioner's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief on the Merits" is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including June 18, 2008, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
06/20/2008 INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS PT H. William Larson, Jr. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL) ***STRICKEN-SEE ORDER DATED 06/24/2008***
06/23/2008 MOTION-BRIEF AMENDMENT PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070
06/23/2008 INITIAL AMD BRIEF-MERITS PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 W/APPENDIX (O&7 & E-MAIL)
06/24/2008 ORDER-BRIEF AMENDMENT GR Petitioners' motion to file amended initial brief on the merits is granted and said amended brief with appendix was filed with this Court on June 23, 2008. Petitioners' initial brief on the merits with appendix filed with this Court on June 20, 2008, is hereby stricken.
07/03/2008 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS) RS Tse Industries, Inc. BY: RS Marie Tomassi 772062
07/03/2008 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
07/25/2008 ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS RS Tse Industries, Inc. BY: RS Marie Tomassi 772062 O&7 & E-MAIL
08/06/2008 REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 O&1
08/14/2008 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS) PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070
08/14/2008 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
09/05/2008 ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED) The Court previously accepted jurisdiction. The Court will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Monday, November 3, 2008. A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary. NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
09/05/2008 ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
09/10/2008 REPLY BRIEF-MERITS PT Larson & Larson, P.A. BY: PT Brandon S. Vesely 22070 O&7 & E-MAIL
11/03/2008 ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
11/05/2009 DISP-QUASHED Under our decision, TSE's malpractice claim regarding the final judgment in the underlying patent action is barred, but the malpractice action regarding the sanctions claim is not barred. Accordingly, we quash that portion of the Second District's decision that reversed the summary judgment as to the malpractice claim regarding the underlying patent infringement action, and we approve the Second District's reversal of the summary judgment as to the malpractice claim regarding sanctions.
12/07/2009 RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED Hon. James Birkhold BY: Hon. James Birkhold 1 VOLUME BRIEFS; 5 VOLUMES RECORD
12/07/2009 MANDATE CC: COUNSEL
01/11/2010 ARCHIVES File