|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/22/2009
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Raydel B. Rodriguez BY: PT George T. Pallas 348694
|
|
|
01/23/2009
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2009 - 1010331 Amount: $300
|
|
|
01/23/2009
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
01/29/2009
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of Jardines v. State, Case No. SC08-2101, which is pending in this Court.
|
|
02/02/2009
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Raydel B. Rodriguez BY: PT George T. Pallas 348694
|
W/APPENDIX (O&5 & E-MAIL)
|
|
09/13/2011
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH)
|
|
Respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before September 28, 2011, why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision in Jardines v. State, (No. SC08-2101)(Fla. April 14, 2011, rehearing denied July 7, 2011). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before October 11, 2011.
|
|
09/30/2011
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Timothy Rhys Morgan Thomas 24959
|
WITHDREW 10/03/2011
|
|
10/03/2011
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Timothy Rhys Morgan Thomas 24959
|
|
|
10/07/2011
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE)
|
|
Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including October 28, 2011, in which to serve its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR SERVING THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
|
|
11/01/2011
|
RESPONSE
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Timothy Rhys Morgan Thomas 24959
|
TO OTSC DATED 09/13/2011 (O&7)
|
|
11/15/2011
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Raydel B. Rodriguez BY: PT George T. Pallas 348694
|
TO OTSC DATED 09/13/2011
|
|
05/10/2012
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
|
|
05/10/2012
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
Upon consideration of the response and petitioner's reply thereto, we have determined to accept jurisdiction and grant the petition for review in the present case. The decision under review is quashed and this matter is remanded to the Third District for reconsideration upon application of this Court's Jardines decision.
|
|
06/18/2012
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
10/18/2012
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
File
|
