|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
09/03/2009
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Jonathan Greenfield BY: PT Lawrence E. Brownstein 775381
|
|
|
09/11/2009
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Jonathan Greenfield BY: PT Lawrence E. Brownstein 775381
|
O&5 & E-MAIL
|
|
09/18/2009
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2009 - 1011885 Amount: $300
|
|
|
09/18/2009
|
Fee Paid in Full
|
|
|
|
10/01/2009
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Dorothea Daniels BY: RS Julie H. Littky-Rubin 983306
|
O&5 & E-MAIL
|
|
01/14/2010
|
ORDER-JURIS ACCEPT/BRIEF SCHED (OA LATER DATE)
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction of these cases and they are hereby consolidated for all appellate purposes. Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument.
Petitioner's initial brief on the merits shall be served on or before February 8, 2010; respondent's answer brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits. Please file an original and seven copies of all briefs.
The Clerk of the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall file the original record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before March 15, 2010. The record shall include the briefs filed in the district court separately indexed.
|
|
02/05/2010
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Jonathan Greenfield BY: PT Lawrence E. Brownstein 775381
|
O&7 & E-MAIL (NO APPENDIX) REQ'D
|
|
02/08/2010
|
APPENDIX
|
PT Jonathan Greenfield BY: PT Lawrence E. Brownstein 775381
|
(TO INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS) -0&7
|
|
02/10/2010
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk BY: Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk
|
4 VOLUMES (CONSISTING OF 1 VOLUME OF BRIEFS & 3 VOLUMES OF RECORD)
|
|
02/24/2010
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Dorothea Daniels BY: RS Julie H. Littky-Rubin 983306
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
03/10/2010
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
Norman M. Waas 614432 BY: Norman M. Waas 614432
|
(BY TENET ST. MARY'S INC.)
|
|
03/12/2010
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Jonathan Greenfield BY: PT Lawrence E. Brownstein 775381
|
O&7 & E-MAIL
|
|
03/15/2010
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioner, Tenet St. Mary's Inc., motion for extension of time is granted and said petitioner is allowed to and including March 23, 2010, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all briefs in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order. (CORRECTED ORDER ISSUED 03/15/10: CHANGING LANGUAGE FROM PET'S REPLY BRIEF FILED 03/12/2010 TO EXTENDING TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF TO 03/23/10)
|
|
05/10/2010
|
ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED)
|
|
The Court previously accepted jurisdiction. The Court will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, September 1, 2010.
A maximum of twenty minutes to the side as consolidated is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
05/10/2010
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
05/21/2010
|
LETTER
|
Norman M. Waas 614432 BY: Norman M. Waas 614432
|
DATED 5/19/10 ADVISING OF ORAL ARGUMENT ATTENDANCE
|
|
07/30/2010
|
LETTER
|
Norman M. Waas 614432 BY: Norman M. Waas 614432
|
DATED 07/28/2010 REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
|
|
09/01/2010
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
10/15/2010
|
NOTICE-ADDRESS CHANGE
|
RS Dorothea Daniels BY: RS Julie H. Littky-Rubin 983306
|
|
|
11/24/2010
|
DISP-REMANDED
|
|
Based on the foregoing, we approve the decision in Daniels v. Greenfield and, accordingly, disapprove the decision in Achumba to the extent it is inconsistent with this opinion. Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We do not reach the issue of whether the DNA testing that was done in this case is admissible to prove that Shea Daniels is the biological father of J.D., a matter that has not been fully litigated in the circuit court. Therefore, on remand, that issue is not foreclosed.
|
|
12/09/2010
|
WEST CORRESPONDENCE
|
|
CORRECTED OPINION: On page 19, added additional firm for respondent.
|
|
12/16/2010
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT RETURNED
|
Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk BY: Hon. Marilyn Nemzura Beuttenmuller, Clerk
|
1 VOLUME BRIEFS AND 3 VOLUMES RECORD
|
|
12/16/2010
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL
|
|
02/17/2011
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
File
|
