Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
02/15/2013
|
PETITION-PROHIBITION
|
|
O&2 (02/20/2013: 6 ADDITIONAL COPIES FILED)
|
|
02/15/2013
|
APPENDIX-PETITION
|
|
O&2
|
|
02/18/2013
|
No Fee - State
|
|
|
|
02/18/2013
|
ORDER-COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
|
Any attorney involved in the above case who is not a member of The Florida Bar should immediately file a proper motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510, if they wish to have this Court consider them as counsel of record. Failure to file a proper motion could result in the imposition of sanctions, including striking the pleading listing the foreign attorney as counsel of record. RE: MICHAEL B. DESANCTIS & J. GERALD HEBERT
|
|
02/18/2013
|
ORDER-HIGH PROFILE
|
|
Because of significant public and media interest in this matter, counsel for the parties are directed to hereafter file an original and eight copies of all pleadings filed with this Court. Per this Court's Administrative Order In Re: Mandatory Submission of Electronic Copies of Documents, AOSC04-84, dated September 13, 2004, counsel are directed to transmit a copy of all documents, including any attachments and appendices, in an electronic format as required by the provisions of that order. All electronic documents filed shall be accessible to persons with disabilities in the manner required by Section 508 of the Federal Rehabilitation Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, sections 282.601 through 282.606, Florida Statutes, and any related regulations or guidelines. FOR GENERAL FILING INFORMATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. AOSC04-84, PLEASE VISIT THE CLERK'S OFFICE WEBSITE AT http://www.floridasupremecourt.org/clerk/index.shtml.
|
|
02/18/2013
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
02/18/2013
|
ORDER-RESPONSE/REPLY REQUESTED
|
|
Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of prohibition. Respondent is hereby requested to file a response to the above-referenced petition on or before February 28, 2013. The response should address both the merits of the petition as well as whether this original writ should be transferred for consideration to the First District Court of Appeal. The petitioner may file a reply on or before March 5, 2013.
|
|
02/22/2013
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY TO RESPONSE)
|
PT Florida Senate SENATE BY: PT Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
|
|
02/22/2013
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
PT Florida Senate SENATE BY: PT Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
|
|
02/22/2013
|
NOTICE-DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
|
PT Florida Senate SENATE BY: PT Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
|
|
02/26/2013
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY TO RESPONSE)
|
|
The Legislative Parties' unopposed motion for extension of time is granted and petitioners' are allowed to and including March 8, 2013, in which to file the reply to the response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONERS FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY TO THE RESPONSE.
|
|
02/27/2013
|
RESPONSE
|
RS Kenneth J. Detzner BY: RS Ashley E. Davis 48032
|
TO ORDER DATED 2/18/13
|
|
02/28/2013
|
RESPONSE
|
RS League of Women Voters of Florida BY: RS Adam Schachter 647101
|
TO ORDER DATED 02/18/2013
|
|
03/01/2013
|
REQUEST-ORAL ARGUMENT
|
RS League of Women Voters of Florida BY: RS Adam Schachter 647101
|
|
|
03/08/2013
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Florida Senate SENATE BY: PT Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
TO ORDER DATED 02/18/2013
|
|
03/12/2013
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Florida Senate SENATE BY: PT Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
TO ORDER DATED 02/18/2013
|
|
04/10/2013
|
ORDER-OA SCHED
|
|
The above case is hereby scheduled for oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, May 9, 2013. A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
04/10/2013
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
05/10/2013
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
06/26/2013
|
MOTION-DISMISS PARTY (VOLUNTARY)
|
RS League of Women Voters of Florida BY: RS Adam Schachter 647101
|
FILED AS "NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY WITHDRAWAL OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF LA RAZA AS RESPONDENT"
|
|
06/28/2013
|
ORDER-PARTY DISMISSAL GR
|
|
Respondent having filed notice of dismissal, it is ordered that the notice is treated as a motion to withdraw as a party, the motion is granted and National Council of La Raza is no longer a party to this case. ***07/01/2013: AMENDED TO ADD CORRECT PARTY FILING MOTION AND SHOW MOTION WAS TREATED AS A MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS A PARTY***
|
|
07/11/2013
|
DISP-DENIED
|
|
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the Legislature has not met its burden of demonstrating that it is entitled to either a writ of prohibition or all writs relief because the circuit court has subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate subsequent fact-based challenges to the legislative apportionment plan and because the circuit court's exercise of this jurisdiction will not interfere with the binding judgment rendered by this Court in Apportionment II. Accordingly, we deny the Legislature's petition for extraordinary relief. It is so ordered.
|
|
09/13/2013
|
ARCHIVES
|
|
File
|