|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
06/03/2013
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CLASS/CONST OFCR)
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
|
|
|
06/05/2013
|
ORDER-HIGH PROFILE
|
|
Because of significant public and media interest in this matter, this case has been designated as a high profile case and all material must be filed through the Florida Courts eFiling Portal. All documents filed will be posted on the Supreme Court web page. Parties are directed to ensure that all documents filed are in compliance with rules 2.420, 2.425 and 2.526 of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
|
|
06/05/2013
|
ORDER-FILING FEE DUE
|
|
The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction in the lower tribunal; however, said notice was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or an order of insolvency from the district court of appeal as required by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.120(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the notice. Petitioner is allowed to and including July 5, 2013, in which to submit the filing fee or an order of insolvency. Failure to submit either of the above referenced documents to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the notice. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement.
|
|
06/05/2013
|
ORDER-COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
|
Any attorney involved in the above case who is not a member of The Florida Bar should immediately file a proper motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.510, if they wish to have this Court consider them as counsel of record. Failure to file a proper motion could result in the imposition of sanctions, including striking the pleading listing the foreign attorney as counsel of record.
|
|
06/05/2013
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
06/07/2013
|
MOTION-EXPEDITE
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
BRIEFING
|
|
|
06/07/2013
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
|
|
|
06/07/2013
|
APPENDIX-JURIS BRIEF
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
TO JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
|
06/07/2013
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CLASS/CONST OFCR)
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
DUPLICATE RECIEVED ON 6/7/13
|
|
06/10/2013
|
Filing Fee $300
|
2013 - 1019713 Amount: $300
|
|
|
06/10/2013
|
Fee Paid in Full
|
|
|
|
06/11/2013
|
MOTION-EXPEDITE
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
BRIEFING (AMENDEDW/ATTACHMENTS)
|
|
06/11/2013
|
MOTION-COUNS PRO HAC VICE (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
JOHN M. DEVANEY
|
|
06/11/2013
|
MOTION-COUNS PRO HAC VICE (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
MARC ERIK ELIAS
|
|
06/14/2013
|
ORDER-COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE GR (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
|
The motion to appear pro hac vice filed in the above cause by Mark Herron, on behalf of John M. Devaney, is hereby granted contingent upon counsel's payment of the $100.00 fee required by section 25.241(3), Florida Statutes (2004), within ten days from the date of this order. FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLY WITH THE PAYMENT REQUIREMENT COULD RESULT IN THIS ORDER BEING VACATED AND THE MOTION BEING DENIED.
|
|
06/14/2013
|
ORDER-COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE GR (FOREIGN COUNSEL)
|
|
The motion to appear pro hac vice filed in the above cause by Mark Herron, on behalf of Marc Erik Elias, is hereby granted contingent upon counsel's payment of the $100.00 fee required by section 25.241(3), Florida Statutes (2004), within ten days from the date of this order. FAILURE TO TIMELY COMPLY WITH THE PAYMENT REQUIREMENT COULD RESULT IN THIS ORDER BEING VACATED AND THE MOTION BEING DENIED.
|
|
06/14/2013
|
RESPONSE
|
RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356 BY: RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
TO PETITIONERS' MOTION FOR EXPEDITED REVIEW
|
|
06/17/2013
|
ORDER-EXPEDITE GR
|
|
SEE SC13-949, TO VIEW ORDER.
|
|
06/18/2013
|
Pro Hac Vice
|
2013 - 1019778 Amount: $200
|
JOHN M. DEVANY & MARC ELIAS
|
|
06/18/2013
|
LETTER
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
DATED 06/17/2013, RE: TRANSMITTAL OF PAYMENT FOR PRO HAC VICE MOTIONS
|
|
|
06/21/2013
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356 BY: RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
|
|
|
06/21/2013
|
NOTICE
|
Ashley E. Davis 48032 BY: Ashley E. Davis 48032
|
OF NO POSITION ON JURISDICTION
|
|
07/02/2013
|
ORDER-OA&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction, hereby consolidates the above cases, and will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Monday, September 16, 2013.
A maximum of twenty minutes to the side as consolidated is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
The petitioners' motion for expedited review is hereby granted. Petitioners' brief on the merits shall be filed on or before 3:00 p.m. July 17, 2013; respondents' brief on the merits shall be filed on or before 3:00 p.m. August 1, 2013; and petitioners' reply brief on the merits shall be filed on or before 3:00 p.m. August 12, 2013. UNLESS BRIEFS ARE TIMELY FILED, THE PRIVILEGE OF ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE FORFEITED.
The Clerk of the First District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before August 1, 2013. The record shall include the briefs filed in the district court separately indexed. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic. If an electronic record, the Clerk of the First District Court of Appeal should contact the Clerk of this Court for instructions on transmittal of the electronic record.
|
|
07/02/2013
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
|
07/17/2013
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
|
|
|
07/17/2013
|
APPENDIX-MERIT BRIEF
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
|
|
07/26/2013
|
REQUEST-JUDICIAL NOTICE
|
RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356 BY: RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
FILED AS "MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF COURT ORDERS"
|
|
07/26/2013
|
APPENDIX-MOTION
|
RS The Florida Senate BY: RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
TO "MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF COURT ORDERS"
|
|
|
08/01/2013
|
NOTICE-ADOPTION
|
Ashley E. Davis 48032 BY: Ashley E. Davis 48032
|
OF LEGISLATIVE PARTIES' ANSWER BRIEF
|
|
|
08/01/2013
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS The Florida Senate BY: RS Raoul G. Cantero 552356
|
LEGISLATIVE PARTIES' ANSWER BRIEF
|
|
08/08/2013
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Jon S. Wheeler BY: Jon S. Wheeler
|
|
|
|
08/12/2013
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Rene Romo BY: PT Mark Herron 199737
|
|
|
|
08/12/2013
|
MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE
|
MR Hon. Ken Pruitt BY: MR Daniel Jay Gerber 764957
|
FORMER LEGISLATIVE PRESIDING OFFICERS
|
|
|
08/12/2013
|
AMICUS CURIAE ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
MR Hon. Ken Pruitt BY: MR Daniel Jay Gerber 764957
|
FORMER LEGISLATIVE PRESIDING OFFICERS
|
|
08/13/2013
|
ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE GR
|
|
***SEE SC13-949, TO VIEW ORDER*** The motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae filed by Ken Pruitt, John Harold Thompson, and John M. McKay is hereby granted and they are allowed to file brief only in support of respondent. The brief by the above referenced amicus curiae was filed with this Court on August 12, 2013.
|
|
08/13/2013
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE GR
|
|
***SEE SC13-949, TO VIEW ORDER*** Respondent's "Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Court Orders" is hereby granted.
|
|
09/16/2013
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2013
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that Florida law should recognize a legislative privilege, but that this privilege is not absolute in this case, where the violations alleged are of an explicit state constitutional provision prohibiting partisan political gerrymandering and improper discriminatory intent in redistricting. We further conclude that the circuit court determined the proper balance of interests by protecting the thoughts or impressions of individual legislators and legislative staff members at this stage of the litigation, but recognizing the compelling, competing interest in ensuring that the Legislature complies with the constitutional mandate regarding redistricting by permitting discovery of all other information and communications pertaining to the constitutional validity of the challenged apportionment plan. Accordingly, we quash the First District's decision under review, approve the circuit court's order, and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
12/23/2013
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC:COUNSEL
|
