Home Justices Public Information
Doc. Date Docketed Description Filed by Notes
01/13/2014 NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI) PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
01/22/2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
01/22/2014 ORDER-FILING FEE DUE The jurisdiction of this Court was invoked by the filing of a Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction in the lower tribunal; however, said notice was not accompanied by the $300.00 filing fee or an order of insolvency from the district court of appeal as required by Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.110(b) and 9.120(b). The filing fee is due and payable at the time of filing the notice. Petitioner is allowed to and including February 21, 2014, in which to submit the filing fee or an order of insolvency. Failure to submit either of the above referenced documents to this Court could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the notice. Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it is not subject to reinstatement.
01/27/2014 LETTER PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053 W/ FILING FEE
01/30/2014 Filing Fee $300 2014 - 1021133 Amount: $300
01/30/2014 Fee Paid in Full
04/24/2014 ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE) The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of consolidated cases of Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc, Case No. SC13-1930 and City of St. Petersburg, etc., v. Westphal, Case No. SC13-1976, which are pending in this Court.
Click to open document 06/29/2016 ORDER-CONSOLIDATION The above cases are hereby consolidated, on the Court's own motion, for all appellate purposes. From this date forward, all documents pertaining to the above consolidated cases should be filed electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal using case number SC14-80 only.
Click to open document 06/29/2016 ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH) The employer respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before July 14, 2016, why this Court should not exercise jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 2016 WL 3191086 (Fla. Jun. 9, 2016). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before July 25, 2016.
Click to open document 07/11/2016 MAIL RETURNED RS Aptium Oncology BY: RS Eduardo E. Neret 967882
Click to open document 07/14/2016 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE) RS Aptium Oncology BY: RS Eduardo E. Neret 967882 UNOPPOSSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Click to open document 07/14/2016 APPENDIX MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RS Aptium Oncology BY: RS Eduardo E. Neret 967882
Click to open document 07/15/2016 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE) Respondent's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to order to show cause is granted and respondent is allowed to and including July 22, 2016, in which to serve its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR SERVING THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
Click to open document 07/22/2016 RESPONSE RS Aptium Oncology BY: RS Eduardo E. Neret 967882
Click to open document 07/27/2016 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY TO RESPONSE) PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053 *7/27/16 Amended Motion Filed*
Click to open document 07/27/2016 MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY TO RESPONSE) PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053 AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND TO TOLL TIME
Click to open document 07/29/2016 ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY TO RESPONSE) Petitioner's Amended Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response to Order to Show Cause and to Toll Time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including August 31, 2016, in which to serve the reply to the response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY TO THE RESPONSE.
Click to open document 08/15/2016 MAIL RETURNED RS Aptium Oncology BY: RS Javier Andres Finlay 63278 7/29/2016 Order
Click to open document 08/30/2016 REPLY TO RESPONSE PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
Click to open document 08/30/2016 MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES PT Mirta Groseclose BY: PT Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
Click to open document 10/27/2016 ORDER-ATTY FEES GR (AMT BY TR CT - M/O) Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees as to proceedings in this Court is granted, the amount to be determined by the Judges of Compensation Claims. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(b).
Click to open document 10/27/2016 DISP-REV GR MERITS (QUASH & REMAND) (TAG) Upon review of the response and reply to the Court's Order to Show Cause dated June 29, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the First District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016). No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
10/27/2016 JURISDICTION ACCEPTED