|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/13/2014
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI)
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
|
|
01/13/2014
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI)
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
***UNCERTIFIED COPY***
|
|
01/22/2014
|
Fee Paid In Full - $300
|
|
|
|
01/22/2014
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
04/24/2014
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC (TAG CASE)
|
|
The proceedings in this Court in the above case are hereby stayed pending disposition of consolidated cases of Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, etc, Case No. SC13-1930 and City of St. Petersburg, etc., v. Westphal, Case No. SC13-1976, which are pending in this Court.
|
|
06/29/2016
|
ORDER-CONSOLIDATION
|
|
The above cases are hereby consolidated, on the Court's own motion, for all appellate purposes.
From this date forward, all documents pertaining to the above consolidated cases should be filed electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal using case number SC14-80 only.
|
|
06/29/2016
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH)
|
|
The employer respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before July 14, 2016, why this Court should not exercise jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decision Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 2016 WL 3191086 (Fla. Jun. 9, 2016). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before July 25, 2016.
|
|
07/11/2016
|
MAIL RETURNED
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
|
|
07/14/2016
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE)
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
UNOPPOSSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
|
|
07/14/2016
|
APPENDIX MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
|
|
07/15/2016
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE)
|
|
Respondent's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to order to show cause is granted and respondent is allowed to and including July 22, 2016, in which to serve its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR SERVING THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
|
|
07/22/2016
|
RESPONSE
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: PT Eduardo E. Neret 967882
|
|
|
|
07/27/2016
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY TO RESPONSE)
|
RS Mirta Groseclose BY: Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
|
*7/27/16 Amended Motion Filed*
|
|
|
07/27/2016
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY TO RESPONSE)
|
RS Mirta Groseclose BY: Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
|
AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
REPLY TO RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND TO TOLL
TIME
|
|
07/29/2016
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY TO RESPONSE)
|
|
Petitioner's Amended Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Response to Order to Show Cause and to Toll Time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including August 31, 2016, in which to serve the reply to the response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE REPLY TO THE RESPONSE.
|
|
08/15/2016
|
MAIL RETURNED
|
PT Aptium Oncology BY: Javier Andres Finlay 63278
|
7/29/2016 Order
|
|
08/30/2016
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
RS Mirta Groseclose BY: Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
|
|
|
|
08/30/2016
|
MOTION-ATTORNEYS FEES
|
RS Mirta Groseclose BY: Marjorie Gadarian Graham 142053
|
|
|
10/27/2016
|
ORDER-ATTY FEES GR (AMT BY TR CT - M/O)
|
|
Petitioner's motion for attorney's fees as to proceedings in this Court is granted, the amount to be determined by the Judges of Compensation Claims. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.400(b).
|
|
|
10/27/2016
|
DISP-REV GR MERITS (QUASH & REMAND) (TAG)
|
|
Upon review of the response and reply to the Court's Order to Show Cause dated June 29, 2016, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the First District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of our decision in Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 194 So. 3d 311 (Fla. 2016).
No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
|
|
10/27/2016
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
|
