Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
03/03/2015
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Herbert Michel BY: PT Richard G. Bartmon 337791
|
|
|
03/04/2015
|
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
INSOLVENT BELOW
|
|
03/04/2015
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
03/31/2015
|
ORDER-DISMISSAL RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
|
|
**4/8/15: VACATED** In reviewing our records, we note that your case is subject to dismissal for failure to comply with this Court's direction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.410.
We have not received the initial brief on jurisdiction with appendix in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d). Failure to file the above referenced documents with this Court within fifteen days from the date of this order could result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the petition for review
Please understand that once this case is dismissed, it may not be subject to reinstatement.
|
|
04/08/2015
|
ORDER-VACATE
|
|
The order of this Court dated March 31, 2015, directing petitioner to file the initial brief on jurisdiction with appendix in accordance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.120(d) is hereby vacated.
|
|
04/09/2015
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH)
|
|
Respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before April 24, 2015 why this Court should not exercise jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions Henry v. State, SC12-578 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2015), and Gridine v. State, SC12-1223 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2015). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before May 4, 2015.
|
|
04/13/2015
|
ORDER-OTHER SUBSTANTIVE
|
|
This Court's order dated April 9, 2015, was issued prematurely. The instant case will be stayed until the motions for rehearing filed in Henry v. State, SC12-578, and Gridine v. State, SC12-1223, are resolved.
|
|
09/28/2015
|
ORDER-SHOW CAUSE (TAG-REVERSE/QUASH)
|
|
Respondent is hereby directed to show cause on or before October 13, 2015, why this Court should not accept jurisdiction in this case, summarily quash the decision being reviewed, and remand for reconsideration in light of our decisions Henry v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly S147 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2015), and Gridine v. State, 40 Fla. L. Weekly S149 (Fla. Mar. 19, 2015). Petitioner may serve a reply on or before October 23, 2015.
|
|
10/13/2015
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (RESPONSE)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nancy Jack 986445
|
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE DATED 28 SEPTEMBER 2015
|
|
10/13/2015
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (RESPONSE)
|
|
Respondent's motion for extension of time to respond to order to show cause dated 28 September 2015 is granted and respondent is allowed to and including October 28, 2015, in which to serve its response. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO RESPONDENT FOR SERVING THE RESPONSE. All other times are extended accordingly.
|
|
10/28/2015
|
RESPONSE
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nancy Jack 986445
|
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
|
10/28/2015
|
RESPONSE (AMD)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nancy Jack 986445
|
AMENDED RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
|
11/09/2015
|
REPLY TO RESPONSE
|
PT Herbert Michel BY: PT Richard G. Bartmon 337791
|
PETITIONER'S REPLY TO STATE'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
|
|
01/20/2016
|
NOTICE
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nancy Jack 986445
|
FILED AS "NOTICE OF PROCEEDING"
|
|
01/29/2016
|
MOTION-STAY (FSC PROCEEDINGS)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nancy Jack 986445
|
|
|
10/11/2016
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS FSC DY
|
|
Respondent's Motion to Stay filed in the above cause is denied as moot.
|
|
10/11/2016
|
JURISDICTION ACCEPTED
|
|
In Disposition Order
|
|
10/11/2016
|
DISP-REV GR MERITS (QUASH & REMAND) (TAG)
|
|
Upon review of the responses to this Court's Order to Show Cause dated September 28, 2015, the Court has determined that it should accept jurisdiction in this case. It is ordered that the Petition for Review is granted, that the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in this case is quashed, and this matter is remanded to the district court for further remand for resentencing in light of the decisions Henry v. State, 175 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 2015), and Gridine v. State, 175 So. 3d 672 (Fla. 2015).
No Motion for Rehearing will be entertained by the Court.
|