|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
08/01/2016
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
|
|
08/09/2016
|
No Fee - State
|
|
STATE APPEAL
|
|
|
08/09/2016
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
|
08/11/2016
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER"
|
|
|
08/11/2016
|
APPENDIX-JURIS BRIEF
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "APPENDIX TO JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT"
|
|
|
08/24/2016
|
MOTION-STAY (PROCEEDINGS BELOW)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "MOTION TO STAY OR RECALL MANDATE"
|
|
|
08/24/2016
|
NOTICE-RELATED CASE(S)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "NOTICE OF RELATED ISSUES"
|
|
|
08/26/2016
|
RESPONSE
|
RS Ronnie J. Knighton BY: RS Tatjana Ostapoff 224634
|
FILED AS "RESPONSE TO MOTION TO STAY OR RECALL MANDATE"
|
|
|
08/29/2016
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS Ronnie J. Knighton BY: RS Tatjana Ostapoff 224634
|
FILED AS "RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION"
|
|
|
09/26/2016
|
ORDER-STAY PROCEEDINGS BELOW GR
|
|
Petitioner's "Motion to Stay or Recall Mandate" filed in the above cause is granted and proceedings in the Fourth District Court of Appeal and in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, are hereby stayed pending disposition of the petition for review filed herein.
|
|
|
10/03/2016
|
NOTICE-RELATED CASE(S)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "NOTICE OF RELATED ISSUES" **RELATED CASE SC16-1720**
|
|
|
12/30/2016
|
ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction.
Petitioner's brief on the merits shall be served on or before January 19, 2017; respondent's brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's brief on the merits.
The Clerk of the Fourth District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before February 28, 2017. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic.
The Court dispenses with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320.
|
|
01/06/2017
|
RECORD
|
Lonn Weissblum 498017 BY: Lonn Weissblum 498017
|
RECORD ON APPEAL- VOLUME 1 (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
|
01/06/2017
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Lonn Weissblum 498017 BY: Lonn Weissblum 498017
|
RECORD ON APPEAL- VOLUMES 2-10 (FILED ELECTRONICALLY) (Minor child's name needs to be redacted before record is released to the public, if requested.)
|
|
01/06/2017
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Lonn Weissblum 498017 BY: Lonn Weissblum 498017
|
SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD ON APPEAL- VOLUME 1 (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
|
01/09/2017
|
RECORD
|
Lonn Weissblum 498017 BY: Lonn Weissblum 498017
|
BRIEFS (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
|
|
01/19/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE INITIAL BRIEF ON MERITS AND TO TOLL TIME FOR SERVICE"
|
|
|
01/20/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioner's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Initial Brief on Merits and to Toll Time for Service" is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including February 20, 2017, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF TIME WILL BE GRANTED TO PETITIONER FOR THE FILING OF THE INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS. All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
|
02/20/2017
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONER"
|
|
|
02/20/2017
|
APPENDIX-MERIT BRIEF
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "APPENDIX TO MERITS BRIEF OF PETITIONER"
|
|
|
03/09/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
RS Ronnie J. Knighton BY: RS Tatjana Ostapoff 224634
|
FILED AS "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS"
|
|
|
03/10/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Respondent's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer Brief on the Merits" is granted, and respondent is allowed to and including April 19, 2017, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied. All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
|
04/19/2017
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Ronnie J. Knighton BY: RS Tatjana Ostapoff 224634
|
FILED AS "RESPONDENT'S ANSWER BRIEF ON THE MERITS"
|
|
|
05/15/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE REPLY BRIEF ON MERITS
AND TO TOLL TIME FOR SERVICE"
|
|
|
05/16/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioner's "Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Reply Brief on Merits and to Toll Time for Service" is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including June 15, 2017, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
|
|
|
06/15/2017
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "REPLY BRIEF OF PETITIONER ON MERITS"
|
|
|
06/15/2017
|
APPENDIX-MERIT BRIEF
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Jeanine M. Germanowicz 19607
|
FILED AS "APPENDIX TO MERITS BRIEF OF PETITIONER"
|
|
|
02/01/2018
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: Therefore, we quash the decision of the Fourth District in Knighton and remand to the district court for any further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Furthermore, we disapprove of the Second District's decision in Harris, to the extent that it conflicts with this opinion, and we approve of Harris, to the extent that it is consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
02/23/2018
|
MANDATE
|
|
|
|
|
02/23/2018
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
