|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
01/11/2016
|
CODE-JUDICIAL CONDUCT
|
PS Code Of Judicial Conduct CODE BY: PS Code Of Judicial Conduct CODE
|
NO PETITION FILED, PUBLICATION NOTICE ISSUED 02/11/2016
|
|
01/11/2016
|
No Fee Required
|
|
|
|
02/11/2016
|
LETTER-BAR NEWS PUBLICATION REQUEST
|
|
TO PUBLISH IN THE MARCH 1, 2016, BAR NEWS WITH COMMENTS DUE 04/01/2016
|
|
|
03/29/2016
|
COMMENTS
|
NP Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee BY: NP Barbara Lagoa 966990
|
FILED AS "THE JUDICIAL ETHICS ADVISORY COMMITTEE'S COMMENT ON THE COURT'S PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT"
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (MISC)
|
CHR David Robert Hoyle 616052 BY: CHR David Robert Hoyle 616052
|
|
|
|
03/31/2016
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (MISC)
|
CH Rodney Smith 195987 BY: CH Rodney Smith 195987
|
MOTION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE
RESOLUTION RULES AND POLICY FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO FILE COMMENTS
|
|
|
04/04/2016
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (MISC)
|
|
The Executive Council of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of The Florida Bar's motion for extension of time is granted and the Council is allowed to and including April 29, 2016, in which to file its comments.
The Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy's motion for extension of time is granted and the Committee is allowed to and including April 29, 2016, in which to file its comments.
|
|
|
04/20/2016
|
COMMENTS
|
PR Supreme Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy BY: CH Rodney Smith 195987
|
THE COMMITTEE ON ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
RULES AND POLICY'S COMMENT ON THE COURT'S
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE OF JUDICIAL
CONDUCT
|
|
|
04/29/2016
|
COMMENTS
|
PO Executive Council Of The Alternative Dispute Resolution Section Of The Florida Bar BY: CHR David Robert Hoyle 616052
|
COMMENT TO AMENDMENTS TO THE CODE OF JUDICIAL
CONDUCT-SENIOR JUDGES SERVING AS VOLUNTARY TRIAL
RESOLUTION JUDGES
|
|
|
05/11/2016
|
ORDER-NO REQ SCHED (MISC)
|
|
The above case has been submitted to the Court without oral argument.
|
|
|
07/07/2016
|
ORDER-CASE STYLE CHANGE
|
|
The style of the above case has been changed from In re: Amendments to the Code of Judicial Conduct - Senior Judges Serving as Voluntary Trial Resolution Judges to In re: Amendments to the Code of Judicial Conduct - Senior Judges Serving as Voluntary Trial Resolution Judges and Arbitrators.
|
|
|
07/07/2016
|
DISP-AMENDED/ADOPTED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: After considering the comments filed, we amend Canon 5F(2) of the Code to prohibit a senior judge from serving as a voluntary trial resolution judge or an arbitrator in any case in a circuit in which the judge is presiding as a senior judge. We agree with the ADR Section that the same ethical concerns that warranted prohibiting same-circuit dual service as a senior judge and a mediator and now warrants extending that prohibition to a senior judge who serves as a voluntary trial resolution judge, also warrants extending same-circuit dual-service prohibition to a senior judge who serves as an arbitrator. We also agree with the ADR Section that, like a senior judge who provides mediation services, a senior judge who offers voluntary trial resolution or arbitration services should be expressly prohibited from directly or indirectly promoting those services and from permitting an entity with which the senior judge associates to do so.
Accordingly, we amend Canon 5F(2) and its commentary, as well as section B of the application section of the Code of Judicial Conduct as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring, and deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective October 1, 2016, at 12:01 a.m.
|
|
|
07/28/2016
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
