|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
05/01/2017
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (DIRECT CONFLICT)
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
|
|
05/03/2017
|
No Fee - Insolvent
|
|
INSOLVENT BELOW
|
|
|
05/03/2017
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
|
05/05/2017
|
JURIS INITIAL BRIEF
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
|
|
|
05/05/2017
|
APPENDIX-JURIS BRIEF
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
|
|
|
05/25/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (JURIS BRIEF)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nikole Hiciano 844411
|
|
|
|
05/26/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (JURIS BRIEF-RESPONDENT)
|
|
Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted and respondent is allowed to and including July 5, 2017, in which to serve the jurisdictional answer brief. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
|
|
|
06/06/2017
|
JURIS ANSWER BRIEF
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nikole Hiciano 844411
|
|
|
|
10/09/2017
|
ORDER-NO REQ&BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction.
Petitioner's brief on the merits shall be served on or before October 30, 2017; respondent's brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of petitioner's brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits shall be served twenty days after service of respondent's brief on the merits.
The Clerk of the Third District Court of Appeal shall file the record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before December 8, 2017. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic.
The Court dispenses with oral argument pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.320.
|
|
|
10/24/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits
|
|
|
10/24/2017
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
Petitioner's Request to Toll Time
|
|
|
10/25/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief on the Merits is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including November 13, 2017, in which to serve the initial brief on the merits. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
|
11/13/2017
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
Initial Brief of Petitioner on the Merits
|
|
|
11/13/2017
|
APPENDIX-MERIT BRIEF
|
PT Francisco Rodriguez BY: PT Natasha Baker-Bradley 107460
|
Appendix to Initial Brief of Petitioner on the Merits
|
|
11/29/2017
|
RECORD
|
Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks
|
Record of Appeal - Trial Court Record (Filed Electronically)
|
|
|
12/01/2017
|
RECORD
|
Mary Cay Blanks BY: Mary Cay Blanks
|
Record on Appeal - District Court Record (Filed Electronically)
|
|
|
12/08/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nikole Hiciano 844411
|
Motion for Extension of Time to Response
|
|
|
12/13/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Respondent's motion for extension of time is granted, and respondent is allowed to and including January 10, 2018, in which to serve the answer brief on the merits. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
All other times will be extended accordingly.
|
|
|
01/09/2018
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS State Of Florida state1 BY: RS Nikole Hiciano 844411
|
Answer Brief of Respondent
|
|
|
07/12/2018
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: Consistent with our precedent, we quash the Third District's decision in this case and remand for reconsideration under the correct harmless error standard. We decline to address the additional issue raised by Rodriguez that is beyond the scope of the conflict issue. See Williams, 863 So. 2d at 1190. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
08/02/2018
|
MANDATE
|
|
|
|
|
08/03/2018
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
