|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
05/05/2017
|
NOTICE-DISCRETIONARY JURIS (CERT GPI)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Pamela J. Koller 775990
|
|
|
05/10/2017
|
No Fee - State
|
|
STATE APPEAL
|
|
|
05/10/2017
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
|
05/26/2017
|
ORDER-JURIS ACCEPT/BRIEF SCHED (OA LATER DATE)
|
|
The Court accepts jurisdiction of this case.
Petitioner's initial brief on the merits must be served on or before June 15, 2017; respondent's answer brief on the merits must be served twenty days after service of petitioner's initial brief on the merits; and petitioner's reply brief on the merits must be served twenty days after service of respondent's answer brief on the merits.
The Clerk of the Fifth District Court of Appeal must file the record which must be properly indexed and paginated on or before July 25, 2017. The Clerk may provide the record in the format as currently maintained at the district court, either paper or electronic.
Oral argument will be set by separate order. Counsel for the parties will be notified of the oral argument date approximately sixty days prior to oral argument.
|
|
|
06/15/2017
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Pamela J. Koller 775990
|
FILED AS "MERITS BRIEF OF PETITIONER" W/ APPENDIX
|
|
|
07/05/2017
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
RS Kenneth Purdy BY: RS Matthew R. Mclain 98018
|
FILED AS "MERITS BRIEF OF RESPONDENT"
|
|
07/07/2017
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Joanne P. Simmons BY: Joanne P. Simmons
|
RECORD ON APPEAL (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
|
07/07/2017
|
RECORD/TRANSCRIPT
|
Joanne P. Simmons BY: Joanne P. Simmons
|
RECORD ON APPEAL (FILED ELECTRONICALLY)
|
|
|
07/17/2017
|
MOTION-AMICUS CURIAE
|
MR Florida Juvenile Resentencing And Review Project FJRRP BY: MR Roseanne Eckert 82491
|
FILED AS "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
RESPONDENT"
|
|
|
07/17/2017
|
AMICUS CURIAE ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
MR Florida Juvenile Resentencing And Review Project FJRRP BY: MR Roseanne Eckert 82491
|
FILED AS "BRIEF OF THE FLORIDA JUVENILE RESENENTENCING AND REVIEW PROJECT AND THE FAIR PUNISHMENT PROJECT AS AMICI CURIAE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT"
|
|
|
07/18/2017
|
ORDER-AMICUS CURIAE GR
|
|
The motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae filed by Florida Resentencing and Review Project at the FIU College of Law and the Fair Punishment Project is hereby granted and they are allowed to file brief only in support of respondent. The brief by the above referenced amicus curiae was filed with this Court on July 17, 2017.
|
|
|
07/19/2017
|
MOTION-EXT OF TIME (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Pamela J. Koller 775990
|
FILED AS "PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME"
|
|
|
07/19/2017
|
MOTION-TOLL TIME
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Pamela J. Koller 775990
|
FILED AS "RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO TOLL TIME"
|
|
|
07/20/2017
|
ORDER-EXT OF TIME GR (REPLY BRIEF-MERITS)
|
|
Petitioner's motion for extension of time is granted and petitioner is allowed to and including August 31, 2017, in which to serve the reply brief on the merits. Multiple extensions of time for the same filing are discouraged. Absent extenuating circumstances, subsequent requests may be denied.
|
|
|
08/28/2017
|
NOTICE
|
PT State Of Florida state1 BY: PT Pamela J. Koller 775990
|
Notice of Intent not to File Reply Brief to Respondent's Answer Brief
|
|
|
09/05/2017
|
ORDER-OA SCHED (PREV ACCEPTED)
|
|
The Court previously accepted jurisdiction. The Court will hear oral argument at 9:00 a.m., Wednesday, December 6, 2017.
A maximum of twenty minutes to the side is allowed for the argument, but counsel is expected to use only so much of that time as is necessary.
NO CONTINUANCES WILL BE GRANTED EXCEPT UPON A SHOWING OF EXTREME HARDSHIP.
|
|
09/05/2017
|
ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR
|
|
|
|
12/06/2017
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD
|
|
|
|
|
08/30/2018
|
DISP-QUASHED & REMANDED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: Because the plain language of the juvenile sentencing statutes does not provide for aggregation of sentences at judicial sentence review, we answer the certified question in the negative, quash the Fifth District's decision below, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
09/20/2018
|
MANDATE
|
|
|
|
|
09/21/2018
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
