|
Doc.
|
Date Docketed
|
Description
|
Filed by
|
Notes
|
|
09/11/2018
|
CERTFD JUDGMENT FROM TRIAL COURT
|
|
|
|
09/11/2018
|
No Fee - State
|
|
|
|
|
09/11/2018
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENT LETTER-NEW CASE
|
Supreme Court Of Florida BY: Supreme Court Of Florida
|
|
|
|
09/11/2018
|
COPY OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL ORDER/ACTION BEING APPEALED
|
|
Copy of circuit court order.
|
|
|
09/12/2018
|
ORDER-BRIEF SCHED/JURIS ACCEPTED (CERT JUDGMT)
|
|
The First District Court of Appeal has certified, pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(5) of the Constitution of Florida, that the trial court passes upon a question of great public importance requiring immediate resolution by this Court. We accept jurisdiction.
Briefs shall be filed as follows: Appellants' briefs on the merits shall be filed no later than 3:00 p.m., Monday, September 17, 2018; Appellees' answer brief on the merits shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m., Friday, September 21, 2018; and Appellants' reply brief on the merits shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m., Monday, September 24, 2018.
The Clerk of the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida shall file the original record which shall be properly indexed and paginated on or before Thursday, September 13, 2018. The Court postpones its decision as to whether the above case will be submitted to the Court with or without oral argument.
|
|
|
09/12/2018
|
NOTICE-APPEARANCE
|
AA Kenneth J. Detzner BY: AA Bradley R. Mcvay 79034
|
|
|
|
09/12/2018
|
RECORD
|
Gwen Marshall LEON BY: Gwen Marshall LEON
|
1 VOLUME RECORD ON APPEAL - Filed Electronically
|
|
|
09/17/2018
|
INITIAL BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Kenneth J. Detzner BY: AA Amit Agarwal 125637
|
Appellant's Initial Brief
|
|
|
09/21/2018
|
ANSWER BRIEF-MERITS
|
AE Harry Lee Anstead BY: AE Joseph W. Little 196749
|
ANSWER BRIEF OF APPELLEES ANSTEAD AND BARNAS
|
|
|
09/24/2018
|
REPLY BRIEF-MERITS
|
AA Kenneth J. Detzner BY: AA Amit Agarwal 125637
|
|
|
|
10/17/2018
|
DISP-REVERSED
|
|
FSC-OPINION: For the foregoing reasons, we hold that the circuit court erred in granting the petition for writ of quo warranto because the standard for obtaining relief was not met. We further hold the proposed amendments are not defective for bundling independent and unrelated measures. Finally, we hold the ballot language of Amendment 11 does not mislead voters with respect to the amendment's legal effect. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the circuit court and order that Amendments 7, 9, and 11 appear on the ballot for the November 2018 general election. No motion for rehearing will be allowed, and the mandate shall issue immediately. It is so ordered.
|
|
|
10/17/2018
|
MANDATE
|
|
CC: COUNSEL & DCA CLERK
|
|
|
11/09/2018
|
PUBLISH FULL
|
|
|
